Table 4.
Representation of statistical analysis comparing number of infected animals for T. equi and B. caballi by cELISA, IFAT and nPCR
Animal | cELISA vs nPCR | cELISA vs IFAT | nPCR vs IFAT | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. equi | T. equi | T. equi | B. caballi | |||||
χ2 | Sig. | χ2 | Sig. | χ2 | Sig. | χ2 | Sig. | |
Horses | 8.022 | 0.005* | 1.882 | 0.170 | 2.283 | 0.131 | 0.125 | 0.724 |
Donkeys | 2.941 | 0.086 | 0.571 | 0.450 | 0.947 | 0.330 | 2.667 | 0.102 |
Total | 10.646 | 0.001* | 2.323 | 0.128 | 3.176 | 0.075 | 0.643 | 0.423 |
Data was analyzed by χ2 and Sig. represents statistical significance for *P < 0.05