Table 3.
Comparison of vitamin A deficiency of children between 2002 and 2012(%/n)
Age group (year) | 2002 | 2012 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | |||||||||
Boys | Girls | Total | Boys | Girls | Total | Boys | Girls | Total | Boys | Girls | Total | |
6–9 | 5.06/24 | 4.38/21 | 4.72/45 | 13.35/250 | 12.14/218 | 12.76/468 | 11.90/85 | 9.41/65 | 10.68/150 | 9.45/92 | 8.24/79 | 8.85/171 |
10–13 | 2.64/9 | 2.55/9 | 2.59/18a | 6.64/96 | 7.38/104 | 7.00/200b | 8.61/44 | 7.66/42 | 7.64/86c | 6.80/54 | 4.08/31 | 5.47/85d |
Total | 3.83/63 | 10.24/668 | 9.33/236e | 7.34/256f | ||||||||
8.95/731 | 8.18/492g |
aIn urban areas at 2002, 10–13 age group compared to 6–9 age group, x 2 = 4.998 p = 0.025 statistically significant
bIn rural areas at 2002, 10–13 age group compared to6–9 age group, x 2 = 5.765 p = 0.000 statistically significant
cIn urban areas at 2012, 10–13 age group compared to 6–9 age group, x 2 = 6.789 p = 0.009 statistically significant
dIn rural areas at 2012, 10–13 age group compared to 6–9 age group, x 2 = 14.791 p = 0.000 statistically significant
eIn urban areas at 2012 compared to urban in 2002, x 2 = 45.456 p = 0.000 statistically significant
fIn rural areas at 2012compared to rural in 2002, x 2 = 33.257 p = 0.000 statistically significant
gcompared to 2002, x 2 = 2.602 p = 0.107 no statistically significant