Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Mar 4;54(3):913–925. doi: 10.1021/ci4004927

Table IV.

Comparison of Flexible Docking for Ensembles Generated with BP-Dock vs Backrub

RosettaLigand score (kcal/mol)
X-Score (kcal/mol)
protein peptide peptide
classification
peptide binding
specificity
rigid
bound
BP-Dock
unbound
Backrub
unbound
rigid
bound
BP-Dock
unbound
Backrub
unbound
PSD-95 KQTSV I I –230.78 –273.03 –221.83 –7.27 –7.32 –6.66
PSD-95 ATVRTYSC II I NA –271 –223.04 NA –7.1 –7.31
GRIP ATVRTYSC II II –241.76 –229.36 –218.37 –8.14 –7.82 –7.74
GRIP KQTSV I II NA –223.97 –215.32 NA –7.1 –7.15
syntenin DSVF I I and II both –208.24 –205.67 –219.09 –7.29 –7.16 –7.18
syntenin NEFYA II 1 and II both –225.2 –211.88 –219.57 –7.99 –7.85 –6.99
CIPP KQTSV I II NA –150.73 –149.6 NA –7.08 –7.23
CIPP EYLGLDVPV II II NA –151.87 –154.6 NA –7.49 –7.29