Skip to main content
. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0154571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154571

Table 3. Distribution of Spoligotype International Types (SIT) in this study.

SIT* Spoligotype pattern (Octal format) Number in study (%) % in study vs. Database Lineage** Unique or Clustered SIT***
1 000000000003771 12 (4.1) 0.11 Beijing Clustered
4 000000007760771 1 (0.34) 0.26 Unknown Unique
8 400037777413771 12 (4.1) 6 EAI5 Clustered
10 477777277413771 1 (0.34) 1.12 EAI8-MDG Unique
21 703377400001771 76 (25.94) 15.97 CAS1-Kili Clustered
22 703777400001771 1 (0.34) 1.08 CAS1-Delhi Unique
25 703777740003171 3 (1.02) 0.45 CAS1-Delhi Clustered
26 703777740003771 14 (4.78) 0.8 CAS1-Delhi Clustered
34 776377777760771 1 (0.34) 0.11 S Unique
36 777737777720771 1 (0.34) 0.63 H3 Unique
37 777737777760771 4 (1.37) 0.73 T3 Clustered
42 777777607760771 6 (2.05) 0.17 LAM9 Clustered
48 777777777413731 1 (0.34) 0.22 EAI1-SOM Unique
50 777777777720771 3 (1.02) 0.07 H3 Clustered
53 777777777760771 15 (5.12) 0.23 T1 Clustered
59 777777606060771 22 (7.51) 4.54 LAM11-ZWE Clustered
62 777777774020731 1 (0.34) 0.17 H1 Unique
64 777777607560771 2 (0.68) 0.48 LAM6 Clustered
73 777737777760731 1 (0.34) 0.34 T Unique
126 477777777413771 18 (6.14) 12.08 EAI5 Clustered
128 637775777760730 3 (1.02) 8.57 T2-uganda Clustered
135 777777777760730 4 (1.37) 11.43 T2-uganda Clustered
137 777776777760601 1 (0.34) 0.1 X2 Unique
149 777000377760771 4 (1.37) 0.82 T3-ETH Clustered
244 777777777760601 5 (1.71) 4.03 T1 Clustered
245 777777777760671 1 (0.34) 4.55 T1 Unique
281 777775777760771 1 (0.34) 3.13 T1 Unique
288 700377740003771 2 (0.68) 1.27 CAS2 Clustered
345 777000377760731 7 (2.39) 33.33 T3-ETH Clustered
420 637774777760730 6 (2.05) 24 T2-uganda Clustered
458 777777777403771 1 (0.34) 2.7 EAI5 Unique
486 703777740000371 1 (0.34) 1.75 CAS Unique
522 777777777760770 1 (0.34) 6.25 T1 Unique
523 777777777777771 1 (0.34) 1.69 Manu_ancestor Unique
702 700775747413771 1 (0.34) 2.86 EAI6-BGD1 Unique
727 777737774020731 1 (0.34) 2.44 H1 Unique
815 777777606060731 2 (0.68) 1.34 LAM11-ZWE Clustered
891 777777607660771 2 (0.68) 6.67 LAM9 Clustered
1090 077777777413771 2 (0.68) 22.22 EAI5 Clustered
1192 777777677763771 1 (0.34) 10 Manu2 Unique
1369 477777777413671 1 (0.34) 12.5 EAI5 Unique
1549 775777606060731 2 (0.68) 18.18 LAM11-ZWE Clustered
1765 703337400001771 1 (0.34) 14.29 CAS1-Kili Unique
1801 777777777413730 1 (0.34) 25 EAI1-SOM Unique
1824 760377777760701 2 (0.68) 25 T1 Clustered
1957 477777777013771 1 (0.34) 6.67 EAI5 Unique
2196 777775606060731 6 (2.05) 30 LAM11-ZWE Clustered
2267 701377400001771 1 (0.34) 25 CAS Unique
2269 703377400000771 1 (0.34) 20 CAS Unique
2364 703601740003771 1 (0.34) 25 CAS1-Delhi Unique
2391 703377400003771 1 (0.34) 11.11 CAS1-Kili Unique
2484 737377677760771 1 (0.34) 25 T1 Unique
2736 777777777760741 1 (0.34) 25 T1 Unique
3880 437774777760730 2 (0.68) 50 T2-uganda Clustered
4056* 477777777413411 2 (0.68) 100 EAI5 Clustered
4057* 777017777760771 1 (0.34) 50 T1 Unique
4058* 477777777413371 1 (0.34) 50 EAI5 Unique

* A total of 54/57 SITs containing 264 isolates matched a preexisting shared-type in the database, whereas 3/57 SITs (n = 4 isolates) were newly created. A total of 27/57 SITs containing 238 isolates were clustered within this study (2 to 76 isolates per cluster) while 30/57 SITs containing 30 isolates were unique (for total unique strains, one should add to this number the 25 orphan strains, which brings the number of unclustered isolates in this study to 55/293 or 18.77%, and clustered isolates to 238/293 or 81.23%). Note that SITs followed by an asterisk indicates "newly created” SITs due to 2 or more strains belonging to an identical new pattern within this study or after a match with an orphan in the database; SIT designations followed by number of strains: 4056* this study n = 2; 4057* this study n = 1, SDN n = 1; 4058* this study n = 1, NLD n = 1.

** Lineage designations according to SITVIT2; “Unknown” designates patterns with signatures that do not belong to any of the major lineages described in the database.

*** Clustered strains correspond to a similar spoligotype pattern shared by 2 or more strains “within this study”; as opposed to unique strains harboring a spoligotype pattern that does not match with another strain from this study. Unique strains matching a preexisting pattern in the SITVIT2 database are classified as SITs, whereas in case of no match, they are designated as “orphan”.