Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 28;124(5):659–665. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408981

Table 5.

Association between placental mtDNA content and birth weight (g) in INMA, EVIRONAGE, and in the pooled sample.

INMAa,b ENVIRONAGE INMA + ENVIRONAGEc
n Differences in birth weight (g) (95% CI) p-Value Interaction p-value n Differences in birth weight (g) (95% CI) p-Value Interaction p-value n Differences in birth weight (g) (95% CI) p-Value Interaction p-value
All 376 249.0 (83.6, 414.3) 0.003 0.003 550 129.2 (7.8, 259.0) 0.04 0.04 926 140.2 (43.2, 237.2) 0.005 0.009
Boys 194 124.0 (45.6, 202.5) 0.002 NA 277 34.0 (–34.4, 102.4) 0.33 NA 471 65.9 (17.9, 114.0) 0.007 NA
Girls 182 –2.44 (–80.5, 75.6) 0.95 NA 273 –15.2 (–69.3, 39.0) 0.58 NA 455 26.4 (–67.4, 14.6) 0.21 NA
NA, not applicable. Effect size was estimated for each IQR increment (INMA = 0.58; ENVIRONAGE = 0.77; pooled sample = 0.76) in mtDNA content. aModels were adjusted for gestational age (linear and quadratic), newborn’s sex, maternal age, maternal smoking status, prepregnancy BMI, parity, ethnicity, season of birth, education, and interaction term sex and mtDNA content. bFour INMA subcohorts were included as random effect. cCohorts were included as random effect.