Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 25;124(5):578–585. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409400

Table 3.

Results of the sensitivity analyses, showing relative risks (with 95% confidence intervals) of high depressive symptoms at follow-up in study participants exposed to residential road traffic noise (Lden) > 50 dB(A) and ≤ 50 dB(A).

Subgroup Cases (n) Total (n)a RR (95% CI)b
Education
≤ 13 years 214 1,968 1.43 (1.10, 1.85)
> 13 years 65 1,130 0.92 (0.56, 1.53)
Moved during follow-up
Yes 61 502 1.17 (0.72, 1.88)
No 218 2,596 1.33 (1.02, 1.72)
Insomnia
Yes 55 281 1.62 (1.01, 2.59)
No 222 2,803 1.21 (0.94, 1.57)
City of residence
Mülheim/Ruhr 99 1,162 1.21 (0.83, 1.76)
Bochum 89 927 1.51 (1.00, 2.29)
Essen 91 1,009 1.16 (0.77, 1.74)
Excluded lifetime prevalence of depression at baselinec 189 2,382 1.34 (1.01, 1.76)
Noise cutoff Lden > 65 dB(A) 279 3,098 1.07 (0.77, 1.49)
CES-D ≥ 17 only to define outcome 227 3,469 1.24 (0.96, 1.61)
Antidepressant medication only to define outcome 144 3,467 1.28 (0.92, 1.80)
Abbreviations: CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CI, confidence interval; dB(A), A-weighted decibels; RR, relative risk. aMaximum total n in Model 1 = 3,098; numbers differing from those in Table 1 reflect missing covariate data (in Model 1). bAdjusted for age, sex, education (not in the education-stratified analysis), income, economic activity, neighborhood-level socioeconomic status, and traffic proximity (Model 1). No substantial differences were observed in unadjusted results and in results for Model 2 and Model 3 (data not shown). cExcluded 176 participants who reported having/having ever had depression and 605 participants with missing data.