Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr;6(2):144–150. doi: 10.21037/qims.2016.03.03

Table 1. Correlation analysis between FGT (%) quantification and FGT qualitative assessment values.

Assessment method Quantitative FGT (%) Qualitative MG assessment Qualitative MRI assessment
FGT (%)
   Pearson correlation 1 0.805** 0.809**
   Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 0.000
   N 60 60 60
MG
   Pearson correlation 0.805** 1 0.725**
   Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 0.000
   N 60 60 60
MRI
   Pearson correlation 0.809** 0.725** 1
   Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 0.000
   N 60 60 60

**, P<0.05. FGT, fibroglandular tissue; MG, mammogram; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.