Table 1. Correlation analysis between FGT (%) quantification and FGT qualitative assessment values.
Assessment method | Quantitative FGT (%) | Qualitative MG assessment | Qualitative MRI assessment |
---|---|---|---|
FGT (%) | |||
Pearson correlation | 1 | 0.805** | 0.809** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
N | 60 | 60 | 60 |
MG | |||
Pearson correlation | 0.805** | 1 | 0.725** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
N | 60 | 60 | 60 |
MRI | |||
Pearson correlation | 0.809** | 0.725** | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
N | 60 | 60 | 60 |
**, P<0.05. FGT, fibroglandular tissue; MG, mammogram; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.