Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 15;11(5):770–775. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09270915

Table 1.

Clinician opinions on eating during hemodialysis treatment

Position and Year N Strongly Discourage N (%) Discourage N (%) No Opinion N (%) Encourage N (%) Strongly Encourage N (%)
Registered dietitian
 2011 1192 275 (23.1)a 264 (22.1) 95 (8.0) 446 (37.4) 112 (9.4)
 2014 1408 163 (11.6)a,b 204 (14.5)c 97 (6.9)c 607 (43.1)c 337 (23.9)c
 Total 2600 438 (16.8) 468 (18.0)d 192 (7.4)d 1053 (40.5)d 449 (17.3)d
Facility administrator
 2011 1003 316 (31.5)e 238 (23.7) 131 (13.1) 250 (24.9) 68 (6.8)
 2014 1238 312 (25.2)b,e 238 (19.2)c 126 (10.2)c 409 (33.0)c 153 (12.4)c
 Total 2241 628 (28.0) 476 (21.2)f 257 (11.5)f 659 (29.4)f 221 (9.9)f
Medical director
 2011 828 255 (30.8)e 159 (19.2) 158 (29.1) 209 (25.2) 47 (5.7)
 2014 978 235 (24.0)b,e 156 (16.0)c 169 (17.3)c 293 (30.0)c 125 (12.8)c
 Total 1806 490 (27.1) 315 (17.4)d 327 (18.1)d,f 502 (27.8)f 172 (9.5)f

Results of the regression analysis that included position, year, and the interaction term are shown. When the interaction terms or main effects were significant, individual differences were determined by post hoc analysis on the respective category.

a

Significant difference versus facility administrator in given year (P<0.05).

b

Significant difference between 2011 and 2014 in a specific position (P<0.05).

c

Significant difference between 2011 and 2014 (P<0.05).

d

Significant difference versus facility administrators (P<0.05).

e

Significant difference versus registered dietitians in given year (P<0.05).

f

Significant difference versus registered dietitians (P<0.05).