Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 5;46:286–303. doi: 10.1007/s10519-016-9782-6

Table 2.

Reviewed studies examining chorionicity with a behavioral genetic design

Reference N (twin pairs)a Location Placentation determination Age Comparison Analysis Outcome Effect Other notes
Birth weight (BWT), early growth
 Buzzard et al. (1983) 52 MZMC
40 MZDC
72 DZDC
Canada Placental pathology 20–41 years MC versus DC and MZ versus DZ Intra-pair differences BWT MC = DC; MZ = DZ Trends for intra-pair differences in chorionicity and chorionicity by sex interaction
 Vlietinck et al. (1989) 762 MZ
1093 DZ
Belgium Examination of placenta Birth MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Extended ACE model with chorionicity included BWT rMC < rDC (MC also less variable than DC) EFPTS
 Gielen et al. (2008) 4232 twin pairs Belgium Examination of placenta Birth MZ versus DZ, chorionicity a covariate ACE models, chorionicity a covariate BWT Removing chorionicity resulted in a decrease of genetic variance and heritability EFPTS
 Touwslager et al. (2010) 522 individuals Belgium Examination of placenta 0–2 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Intra-pair growth correlations Growth during infancy rMZMC = rMZDC at 0-1, 0-6, or 6-12 months; rMZMC > rMZDC at 12-24 months; EFPTS; MZMC grew more slowly than MZDC
Misc. screening/vaccination
 Wojdemann et al. (2006) 31 MC
150 DC
Denmark Ultrasound Birth MC versus DC ICCs Nuchal translucency rMC = rDC
 Gupta et al. (2008) 117 DC
16 MC
India Examination of placenta Newborns MC versus DC and MZ versus DZ Intra-pair agreement BCG vaccine reaction rMC = rDC; rMZ = rDZ
Handedness
 Carlier et al. (1996) 20 MZMC
24 MZDC
24 DZ
France Examination of placenta 8–12 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Comparison of difference between groups on the average absolute twin difference; if chorion effect not significant, all MZs pooled for MZ/DZ comparison Manual performance, direction, laterality (handedness) No chorionicity effects rMZ = rDZ in classic twin design (chorionicity not controlled)
 Melnick and Myrianthopoulos (1979) 117 MZMC
56 MZDC
USA Sex, nine blood groups, and gross and microscopic examination of placenta Birth through 7 years MZMC versus MZDC Comparing concordance Finger ridge count and right-left asymmetry of ridge count and congenital anomaly (e.g., differentiation of body parts, tissue differentiation or dysplasias) rMZDC < rMZMC for total ridge count. No chorionicity effects for congenital anomalies, other assessments of dermatoglyphics NCPP twin population
Anthropomorphic measures
 Corey et al. (1976) 30 MZMC
22 MZDC
USA Examination of fetal membranes Newborns MZMC versus MZDC General linear model for twin data, applied to MC and DC twins Cholesterol from cord blood Chorion type had a sig effect on within-pair not among-pair variation. rMC > rDC Female MZ > male MZ for cord blood cholesterol
 Hur and Shin (2008) 81 MCMZ
47 DCMZ
457 DZ
S. Korea Examination of placenta 2–9 years (mean = 4 years) MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ ACE models including chorion effects Height, weight, BMI A + C sig. chorion effects for height sig but only 4 %, not sig for weight/BMI
 Blekher et al. (1998) 17 MZMC
16 MZDC
USA Examination of placentas 9–18 years (mean 13.2 years) MZMC versus DC ICCs Saccadic eye movements: accuracy, slope, velocity at 15 degree saccade rMZMC > rMZDC for reaction times; not phasic component of saccadic command. Follows up a traditional MZ/DZ study showing sig. genetic influence
 Souren et al. (2007) 240 MZ
138 DZ
Belgium Examination of placenta Adults MZMC versus MZDC ICCs Body mass, BMI, fat mass, waist-to-hip ratio, sum of four skinfold thickness, lean body mass, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance and beta cell function, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 levels, total, LDL, HDL, total:HDL ratio for cholesterol, triacylglycerol, NEFA and leptin levels rMZMC = rMZDC EFPTS; regular twin study run subsequently
 van den Borst et al. (2012) 165 MZ
71 DZ
102 single twins
Belgium Examination of placenta Adults MZMC versus MZDC ICCs Lung measures: forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity rMZMC = rMZDC EFPTS; regular twin study run subsequently
 Fagard et al. (2003) 125 DZ
97 MZDC
128 MZMC
Belgium Examination of placenta 18–34 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Intra-pair correlations; ACE models fit to MZ/DZ; MZDC/DZ; MZMC/DZ Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure rMZMC = rMZDC Heritability estimates similar when MZ/DZ or MZMC/MZDC EFPTS
 Loos et al. (2001a) 280 MZMC
212 MZDC
311 DZ
Belgium Examination of placenta 18–34 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Intra-pair concordance Abdominal obesity Contribution of zygosity and chorionicity low (< 1.7 %) for adult weight. rDC > rMC for BWT only EFPTS
 Loos et al. (2001b) 67 MC
56 DC
Belgium Examination of placenta M = 25 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ ICCs Fasting fibrinogen rMZMC < rMZDC
Suggested chorionicity effect would change heritability
Article type = “Correspondence” about EFPTS
rMZ > rDZ
Cognitive and brain measures
 Mukherjee et al. (2009) 22 MZMC
17 MZDC
49 DZDC
USA Placental pathology, or ultrasound if pathology not performed or unavailable Prenatal and birth MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Comparing concordance Head circumference and weight at 22 weeks, 32 weeks, birth, and intracranial volume rMZMC = rMZDC head circumference and weight; Sig. group difference on ICV (DZ > MZMC and MZDC)
 Welch et al. (1978) 20 MZMC
12 MZDC
USA Gross and microscopic placental examination 18 months MZMC versus MZDC Differences in within-pair mean squares BWT, Bayley mental development scores rDC > rMC for BWT; not significant (in opposite direction) for Bayley Positive correlation of BWT and Bayley
 Melnick et al. (1978) 86 MZ
173 DZ
USA Sex, nine blood groups, and gross and microscopic examination of placenta 7 years MZMC versus MZDC and MZDC versus DZ Heritability estimates IQ heterogeneity between MZMC/DZ total variances, but not MZDC/DZ. Estimated genetic variance comparing MZMC/DZ not sig diff from 0, but MZDC/DZ was. NCPP twin population, also split by race
 Sokol et al. (1995) 23 MZMC
21 MZDC
USA Gross and microscopic examination of placentas ~6 years MZMC versus MZDC Intra-pair differences McCarthy Scales of Children’ s Abilities and Personality Inventory for Children rMZMC > rMZDC for 3/4 Personality Inventory for Children factor scales, 8/12 clinical scales, and 2/4 validity/screening scales. No differences on 6 McCarthy scales.
 Antoniou et al. (2010) 663 twin pairs Belgium Examination of placenta 7–15 years, M = 10.4 years MZ versus DZ on placentation Bivariate ACE models BWT-IQ and cord knots-IQ associations No chorionicity effect
 Spitz et al. (1996) 20 MZMC
24 MZDC
24 DZ
France Ultrasound and macroscopic examination at delivery 8–12 years MZMC versus MZDC Intra-class correlations Anthropometric measures at birth and assessment; Cognitive battery (Vocabulary, block design from WISC-R, K-ABC, perception and mental rotation rMC < rDC for BWT, child weight, height, BMI. rMC > rDC block design. No chorion effect for vocabulary, K-ABC, perception, or mental rotation
 Jacobs et al. (2001) 161 MZMC
82 MZDC
188 DZ
Belgium Examination of placenta 9–11 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ ACE models including chorion effects WISC-R rMZMC > rMZDC on arithmetic (chorionicity = 14 % of total variance) and vocabulary (chorionicity = 10 %) EFPTS;
High heritability for almost all subscales and IQ scores.
 Gutknecht et al. (1999) 20 MZMC
23 MZDC
France Examination of placenta 10–16 years MZMC versus MZDC Comparison of average within-pair difference between groups Weight, height, BMI; WISC-III; figurative reasoning; schools’ standardized exams; Personality and behavioral measures rMC > rDC weight, BMI; 1/6 WISC-III measures; figurative reasoning, 1/5 personality/behavioral variables (most null) Lack of power; but found consistent direction of effects in even null findings
 Rose et al. (1981) 17 MZMC
15 MZDC
28 DZ
Canada Examination of placenta Adults MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ Mean differences, ICCs, heritability estimates (from several contrasts) WAIS vocabulary and block designs rMZMC > rMZDC (~ 2x) for block design only; vocabulary: rMZMC = rMZDC > rDZ
 Melnick et al. (1980) 94 MZ
187 DZ
USA Gross and microscopic examination of placenta 4 months and 1 year MZ versus DZ, checked chorion effects Within-pair mean square estimates of genetic variance Anterior fontanelle development No chorionicity effects at 4 months or 1 year NCPP twin population, also split by race
Other behavioral measures
 Chen et al. (1990) 44 MZ
18 DZ
China Examination of placenta 6 months MZ versus DZ and MZMC versus MZDC Intra-pair correlations Temperament rMZMC = rMZDC Found genetic influences
 Hur (2007) 56 MZMC
34 DCMZ
316 DZ
S. Korea Examination of placenta 2–9 years (M = 4 years) MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ ACE models including chorion effects Prosocial behaviors No chorionicity or shared environment effects. Twin study estimates good
 Riese et al. (1999) 48 MZMC
29 MZDC
USA Examination of placenta Neonates before released from hospital MZMC versus MZDC ICCs Temperament rMZMC = rMZDC
 Wichers et al. (2002) 202 MZMC
125 MZDC
425 DZ
Belgium Examination of placenta 6–17 years MZMC versus MZDC versus DZ ICCs, ACE model CBCL total problems score rMZDC = rMZMC > rDZ. Chorionicity effect was 0 in the full ACE model EFPTS

Described effects are not necessarily comprehensive. Findings were interpreted by comparing MC and DC similarity (e.g., ICCs)—with MC and DC similarity denoted by r (e.g., the within-twin pair correlation)

a N number of twin pairs unless otherwise noted, MZMC monozygotic monochorionic twins, MZDC monozygotic dichorionic twins, DZDC Dizygotic dichorionic twins, BWT birth weight, MC monochorionic, DC dichorionic, MZ monozygotic, DZ dizygotic, EFPTS East Flanders Prospective Twin Survey, ICC intra-class correlation, BCG Bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine, NCPP NINCDS Collaborative Perinatal Project, BMI body mass index, LDL low density lipoprotein, HDL high density lipoprotein, NEFA non-esterified fatty acids, ICV intracranial volume, BWT birth weight, WISC Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, K-ABC Kaufmann Assessment Battery for Children, WAIS Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, CBCL Child Behavior Checklist