Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 18;5(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4873

Table 1.

Recruitment results for the 20 AURAH study clinical centers, 2013-2014.

Site Length of study period in days Individual patients attending during recruitment period Eligible patients approached Patients consenting (as % of approached = consent rate) Patients responding = completed questionnaires received (as % of approached = response rate)
Barking 335 3475 64 59 (92%) 34 (53%)
Barts 31 a 16 13 (81%) 11 (69%)
Birmingham 127 a 53 49 (92%) 33 (62%)
Brighton 482 13918 c 243 240 (99%) 227 (93%)
Bristol 312 1021 59 58 (98%) 55 (93%)
Calderdale & Huddersfield 428 13662 92 82 (89%) 73 (79%)
Coventry 337 11218 269 b 256 (95%) 246 (91%)
Dean Street 473 51882 d 1384 895 (65%) 604 (44%)
Homerton 300 25312 159 149 (94%) 123 (77%)
John Hunter 450 20236 d 235 131 (56%) 84 (36%)
Kings 283 15500 305 204 (67%) 168 (55%)
Leicester 84 5173 69 66 (96%) 48 (70%)
Mortimer Market 332 13652 e 382 370 (97%) 313 (82%)
Newham 320 9203 168 119 (71%) 113 (67%)
Reading 405 14807 82 75 (91%) 75 (91%)
Royal Free 416 33216 137 126 (92%) 101 (74%)
St George's 333 17041 110 90 (82%) 81 (74%)
The London 247 13747 40 35 (88%) 33 (83%)
WLCSH 463 19094 d 462 270 (58%) 164 (35%)
Whipps Cross 314 5933 64 53 (83%) 44 (69%)
TOTALS - 288090 4393 3340 (76%) 2630 (60%)

aClinic unable to supply data on total clinic attendance

bClinic was unable to supply data about those declining to participate – value derived from 95% consent rate estimated by the clinic

cCovers 75% of the recruitment period only

dCovers 90% of the recruitment period only

eCovers 55% of the recruitment period only