Table 3.
Logistic Regression Models Predicting Whether Fathers Reported Time Spent in Child Care (N = 20,609)
| Variable | Total child care | Routine care | Play | Management | Teaching | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
|
Panel 1
| ||||||||||
| Recessionary effecta | ||||||||||
| Recession | 1.20** | 1.06–1.35 | 1.24*** | 1.09–1.40 | 1.22* | 1.05–1.43 | 1.11 | 0.98–1.26 | 1.08 | 0.94–1.24 |
| Jobless recovery | 1.05 | 0.94–1.17 | 1.07 | 0.95–1.21 | 1.15 | 0.99–1.32 | 1.05 | 0.93–1.18 | 1.13 | 0.99–1.30 |
| Recovery | 1.06 | 0.97–1.17 | 1.10 | 0.99–1.22 | 1.11 | 0.99–1.24 | 1.07 | 0.97–1.19 | 1.08 | 0.96–1.21 |
| Family structureb | ||||||||||
| Male earner couple | 0.70*** | 0.64–0.77 | 0.73*** | 0.66–0.80 | 1.01 | 0.91–1.13 | 0.53*** | 0.47–0.58 | 0.82*** | 0.74–0.92 |
| Female earner couple | 2.13*** | 1.77–2.56 | 2.52*** | 2.08–3.06 | 1.48*** | 1.19–1.84 | 1.45*** | 1.21–1.73 | 2.09*** | 1.71–2.55 |
| Neither employed couple | 1.43** | 1.12–1.83 | 1.65*** | 1.24–2.18 | 1.33 | 0.99–1.79 | 1.03 | 0.79–1.36 | 1.40* | 1.03–1.91 |
| Single fathers | 1.23* | 1.03–1.47 | 1.54*** | 1.26–1.88 | 0.91 | 0.70–1.18 | 1.52*** | 1.29–1.78 | 1.61*** | 1.32–1.96 |
| df | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |||||
| Wald chi-square | 1837.27*** | 2486.63*** | 1494.98*** | 798.34*** | 718.46*** | |||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
Panel 2
| ||||||||||
| Recessionary effecta | ||||||||||
| Recession | 1.29*** | 1.11–1.49 | 1.17* | 1.01–1.36 | 1.25* | 1.03–1.52 | 1.16 | 0.99–1.36 | 1.06 | 0.89–1.26 |
| Jobless recovery | 1.05 | 0.93–1.17 | 1.07 | 0.95–1.21 | 1.15 | 0.99–1.32 | 1.05 | 0.93–1.18 | 1.13 | 0.99–1.30 |
| Recovery | 1.06 | 0.97–1.17 | 1.10 | 0.99–1.22 | 1.11 | 0.99–1.24 | 1.07 | 0.97–1.18 | 1.08 | 0.96–1.21 |
| Family structureb | ||||||||||
| Male earner couple | 0.73*** | 0.66–0.80 | 0.72*** | 0.65–0.80 | 1.03 | 0.92–1.15 | 0.54*** | 0.49–0.61 | 0.82** | 0.73–0.92 |
| Female earner couple | 2.13*** | 1.75–2.59 | 2.45*** | 1.99–3.01 | 1.54*** | 1.23–1.94 | 1.45*** | 1.20–1.75 | 2.00*** | 1.62–2.48 |
| Neither employed couple | 1.46** | 1.12–1.91 | 1.67** | 1.22–2.28 | 1.35 | 0.98–1.86 | 1.09 | 0.82–1.45 | 1.47* | 1.06–2.04 |
| Single fathers | 1.21 | 0.99–1.47 | 1.46*** | 1.17–1.82 | 0.81 | 0.60–1.08 | 1.45*** | 1.22–1.73 | 1.58*** | 1.28–1.96 |
| Interactions | ||||||||||
| Recession × Male earner couple | 0.79 | 0.61–1.03 | 1.07 | 0.81–1.42 | 0.90 | 0.64–1.26 | 0.80 | 0.60–1.06 | 0.99 | 0.73–1.36 |
| Recession × Female earner couple | 1.01 | 0.59–1.73 | 1.26 | 0.72–2.20 | 0.72 | 0.37–1.44 | 0.98 | 0.57–1.67 | 1.38 | 0.76–2.49 |
| Recession × Neither employed couple | 0.85 | 0.43–1.65 | 0.90 | 0.49–1.68 | 0.90 | 0.42–1.92 | 0.67 | 0.30–1.52 | 0.67 | 0.30–1.53 |
| Recession × Single fathers | 1.15 | 0.74–1.77 | 1.44 | 0.91–2.27 | 1.98* | 1.12–3.50 | 1.33 | 0.87–2.02 | 1.13 | 0.70–1.84 |
| df | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |||||
| Wald chi-square | 1850.47*** | 2489.02*** | 1494.65*** | 807.21*** | 720.07*** | |||||
Note: Control variables were included but not presented. The model predicts the probability of spending time in child care (at least one minute) rather than not spending time in child care.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.
Referent is pre-recession period.
Referent is dual earner couple.