Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;203(1):353–368. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.185231

Table 2. Phosphorylation sites and genes selected for further characterization.

Gene symbol Target sequence Modification position Observed phenotype(s)a Function
APN1 ATAEPS(ph)DNDILSQMTK S350 MMS-sensitive Base excision repair
APN1 ATAEPSDNDILS(ph)QMTK S356
CTF4 LFSDIT(ph)QEANAEDVFT(ph)QTHDGPSGLSEK T401, T411 MMS-sensitive Checkpoint; Sister-chromatid cohesion
TOF1 LTVSGS(ph)QALVDEK S379 MMS-sensitive; Interact with rad9Δ and dia2Δ.
TOF1 FNIS(ph)EGDITK S626
MPH1 T(ph)GSSEEAQISGMNQK T540 MMS-sensitive HR intermediate resolution
MPH1 TGS(ph)S(ph)EEAQISGMNQK S542 or S543b
RAD50 QVFPLT(ph)QEFQR T568 MMS-sensitive MRX
XRS2 APEVEAS(ph)PVVSK S349 MMS-sensitive; Telomere maintenance; Interact with exo1Δ, yku80Δ, and sae2Δ
XRS2 NAAFLIT(ph)R T675
RAD18 INFTSMT(ph)QS(ph)QIK T282 or S284b MMS-sensitive PRR
RAD18 SMT(ph)DILPLSSKPSK T155

Since PRR genes play an essential role in the replication stress response, RAD18 was included even though the induction of phosphorylation by MMS for these proteins was detected in only one of the forward or label-swap experiments. The same is true for the phosphorylation of Mph1T540 and Apn1S356. The mass spectra of the detected phosphopeptides from these gene products (in either the forward or label-swap experiment) were manually inspected and confirmed.

a

The observed phenotypes reflect phenotypes of the phospho-mutants in which all detected MMS-inducible phosphosites are mutated.

b

The mass spectra were not able to distinguish between phosphorylation of Mph1 on S542 vs. S543 or phosphorylation of Rad18 on T282 vs. S284; in all ambiguous cases, both sites were mutated.