Skip to main content
. 2016 May 6;15:261. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1304-8

Table 1.

McNemar’s χ2 test of haplotype proportions from pre- and post-treatment parasite pairs

Pre- and post-treatment
Pre Post McNemar’s χ2 (p value) OR (95 % CI)
AMA1 DQRHFDKY Other
DQRHFDKY 0 0
Other 2 8 2 (0.16) ND
EBA140 VSTK Other
VSTK 5 2
Other 3 5 0.2 (0.65) 0.9 (0.5–1.6)
EBA181 Q K
Q 5 4
K 2 2 0.67 (0.41) 1.3 (0.7–2.4)
EBA175 EKEKPISENKKK Other
EKEKPISENKKK
Other No data
EBL-1 QFFFF.VN Other
QFFFF.VN
Other No data
MSP1 KD Other
KD 7 2
Other 5 3 1.29 (0.26) 0.8 (0.5–1.2)
MSP3 K1 3D7
K1 4 2
3D7 3 0 0.2 (0.65)  0.9 (0.4–1.7) 
MSP6 K1 3D7
K1 1 2
3D7 3 9 0.2 (0.65) 0.8 (0.2–2.7)
MSPDBL1 ALTAIKY Other
ALTAIKY
Other No data
MSPDBL2 AHQAIRY Other
AHQAIRY 2 6
Other 7 3 0.08 (0.78) 0.9 (0.4–2.0)
Rh1 4HN2QN Other
4HN2QN 1 2
Other 1 3 0.33 (0.56) 1.5 (0.4–6.0)
Rh2b 156insQ585del Other
156insQ585del
Other No data
Rh5 HD YH
HD 13 4
YH 0 3 4 (0.046) 1.3 (1.0–1.7)

italic value indicates a significant increase in the odds of the Rh5 haplotypes changing compared to staying the same between parasite pairs before and after treatment

Other represents genes with more than 2 high frequency haplotypes, the dominant allele was compared to all other alleles in the population, ND not determined, No data insufficient pairs for the analysis <4