Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 21;5(1):e002485. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002485

Table 1.

Comparison of Gravimetric and Echocardiographic Data in Doxorubicin Cardiomyopathy

Variable WT Saline (n=10) WT Dox (n=10) ITCH‐Tg Saline (n=10) ITCH‐Tg Dox (n=10)
BW before, g 23.6±1.5 23.2±1.4 23.6±2.1 23.9±1.5
BW after, g 23.7±1.6 19.4±2.5a 23.9±2.1b 20.9±1.9a, b, c
HW after, mg 115.6±11.8 76.5±9.4a 117.7±13.5b 95.7±12.4a, b, c
HW/BW ratio 4.88±0.45 3.97±0.33a 4.92±0.35b 4.56±0.40a, b, c
Heart rate, bpm 548±19 542±17 567±12 554±14
IVSd, mm 0.82±0.08 0.72±0.09a 0.84±0.06b 0.74±0.07a, c
LVEDD, mm 2.69±0.11 3.04±0.14a 2.72±0.08b 2.83±0.13a, b, c
LVPWd, mm 0.87±0.13 0.73±0.12a 0.90±0.13b 0.77±0.14a, c
%FS (%) 54±5 38±7a 55±4b 51±6a, b, c

Mean±SD. %FS indicates fractioning shortening; bpm, beats per minute; BW, body weight; Dox, doxorubicin; HW, heart weight; ITCH‐Tg, cardiac‐specific overexpression of ITCH transgenic mouse; IVSd, interventricular septal diameter; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastole dimension; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall diameter; WT, wild type.

a

P<0.05 vs WT saline group.

b

P<0.05 vs WT Dox group.

c

P<0.05 vs ITCH‐Tg saline group by ANOVA with Scheffe post hoc test.