Skip to main content
. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0154848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154848

Table 3. The performance comparison based on Douban dataset.

Training Metrics HeatS PMF (baseline) HP SR EISR (JC) EISR (CN) EISR (PA) EISR (RAI)
60% MAE 0.6482 0.6378 0.6376 0.6282 0.6168 0.6084 0.5985 0.5927
60% RMSE 0.8024 0.7912 0.7911 0.7802 0.7681 0.7625 0.7558 0.7515
80% MAE 0.6370 0.6277 0.6274 0.6093 0.5937 0.5898 0.5783 0.5730
80% RMSE 0.7881 0.7794 0.7792 0.7615 0.7590 0.7545 0.7451 0.7435
90% MAE 0.6234 0.6163 0.6161 0.5983 0.5883 0.5862 0.5783 0.5741
90% RMSE 0.7764 0.7601 0.7600 0.7588 0.7501 0.7456 0.7386 0.7366