Skip to main content
. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0153889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153889

Table 2. Estimated pollination services and economic benefits to each variety provided by the four pollinator guilds studied based on visitation rates and effectiveness (after 3 visits).

Measures of standard deviation are included in brackets.

Pollinator Variety
Cox Gala Bramley Braeburn
Proportion of Service (%) Benefit (£M) Proportion of Service (%) Benefit (£M) Proportion of Service (%) Benefit (£M) Proportion of Service (%) Benefit (£M) Total Benefit (£M)
Bumblebees 21% (±13%) £4.2 (±2.7)M 13% (±19%) £5.3 (±5.4)M 15% (±17%) £7.4 (±8.3) M 38% (±33%) £1.7 (±1.4)M £18.6M (±£17.8M)
Honeybee 25% (±14%) £5.1 (±2.8)M 28% (±28%) £2.6 (±3.6)M 26% (±30%) £12.7(±14.7)M 23% (±22%) £1.0 (±0.9)M £21.4M (± £22M)
Hoverflies 0.3% (±1%) £0.1 (±0.1)M 2% (±5%) £0.4 (±1.0)M 0.4% (±1%) £0.2 (±0.3) M 1% (±1%) £0.04(±0.06)M £0.7M (±1.5M)
Solitary bees 54% (±21%) £10.9 (±4.1)M 57% (±29%) £11.0 (±5.5)M 58% (±39%) £27.8 (±18.8)M 39% (±24%) £1.7 (±1.0)M £51.4M (±29.4M)

Proportion of service (%) = the average percentage contribution to total pollination services made by the taxa to the variety. Benefits (£M) = the monetary benefits, in million £ of additional production, of the pollination services provided by the taxa to that specific variety.