Skip to main content
. 2016;18(1):15–27.

Table 2.

Validation Studies for Current Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems

Study Country N Preoperative Imaging Postoperative Imaging Definition of Stone Free Clearance by Stone Complexity Complications by Stone Complexity Statistical Method
Guy’s Stone Score
Thomas K et al7 United Kingdom 100 CT, radiograph, IVU KUB radiograph < 4-mm fragments Overall, 62% Not reported; no significant correlation only Multivariate linear regression analysis
Grade 1, 81%
Grade 2, 72.4%
Grade 3, 35%
Grade 4, 29%
Mandal S et al11 India 278 Radiograph, IVU, USS, noncontrast CT KUB radiograph Complete absence of stones Overall, 76.1% Overall, 41.7% Univariate analysis
Grade 1, 100% Grade 1, 4.8%
Grade 2, 74% Grade 2, 9.1%
Grade 3, 56% Grade 3, 26.2%
Grade 4, 0% Grade 4, 44.4%
Vicentini FC et al13 Brazil 147 Noncontrast CT Asymptomatic fragments < 4 mm Overall, 71.6% Overall, 18.7% Univariate analysis
Grade 1, 95.2% Grade 1, 4.8%
Grade 2, 79.5% Grade 2, 9.1%
Grade 3, 59.5% Grade 3, 26.2%
Grade 4, 40.7% Grade 4, 44.4%
Ingimarsson JP et al14 Lebanon 66 Noncontrast CT No fragments/no fragments > 2 mm/no fragments > 4 mm Overall, 90% Not reported; no significant correlation only Univariate analysis
Grade 1, 95%
Grade 2, 97%
Grade 3, 95%
Grade 4, 75%
Labadie K et al12 United States 246 CT scan Unclear Not defined Overall, 56% Overall, 17% Logistic regression
Grade 1, 70.2%
Grade 2, 65.4%
Grade 3, 48.1%
Grade 4, 35.9%
Noureldin YA et al27 Canada 185 Unclear Plain radiographs or non-contrast CT Asymptomatic residual fragments < 4 mm Overall, 71.9% Overall, 16.2% Logistic regression analysis
Grade 1, 91.5% Grade 1, 17%
Grade 2, 80% Grade 2, 15%
Grade 3, 47.6% Grade 3, 9.5%
Grade 4, 43.2% Grade 4, 21.6%
Bozkurt IH et al20 Turkey 437 CT scan KUB radiograph (unless CT; which is reserved for only symptomatic patients) Asymptomatic residual fragments < 4 mm Overall, 75% Overall, 35% Linear and logistic regression analyses
Grade 1, 92.8% Grade 1, 13.0%
Grade 2, 72.4% Grade 2, 2.5%
Grade 3, 68.5% Grade 3, 8.7%
Grade 4, 47.4% Grade 4, 10.3%
Nephrolithometric Nomogram (CROES)
Smith A et al8 International (CROES PCNL Group) 2806 Unclear KUB radiograph No fragments > 4 mm Overall, 82% Not reported Multivariate logistic regression
Odds ratios and nomogram reported
ROC AUC 5 0.76
Labadie K et al12 United States 246 CT scan Unclear Not defined Overall, 56% Overall, 17% Logistic regression
80–129 = 22.7%
130–169 = 46.4%
170–219 = 45.5%
≥ 220 = 72.7%
Bozkurt IH et al20 Turkey 437 CT scan KUB radiograph (unless CT; which is reserved for only symptomatic patients) Asymptomatic residual fragments < 4 mm Overall, 75% Overall, 35% Linear and logistic regression analyses
Grade 1, 48.5% Grade 1, 4.8%
Grade 2, 51.4% Grade 2, 8.0%
Grade 3, 69.1% Grade 3, 7.5%
Grade 4, 92.8% Grade 4, 14.2%
S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry
Okhunov Z et al9 United States 117 Noncontrast CT Fluoroscopy ± CT Complete absence of stones on CT Overall, 80% Not reported Multivariate logistic regression
Low (4–5), 94%–100%; medium (6–8), 83%–92%; high (9–11), 27%–64%;
ROC AUC = 0.83
Okhunov Z et al24 United States 58 Noncontrast CT Fluoroscopy ± CT N/Aa N/Aa N/Aa Cohen’s kappa coefficienta
Okhunov Z et al26 United States 706 CT scan Unclear Not defined Overall 67% S.T.O.N.E. score significantly associated with overall complication rate Univariate analysis
S.T.O.N.E. score significantly associated with postoperative SFS
Labadie K et al12 United States 246 CT scan Unclear Not defined Overall, 56% Overall, 17% Logistic regression
5–6 5 70.6%
7–8 5 66.3%
9–13 5 46.2%
ROC AUC = 0.67
Akhavein A et al25 United States 122 CT scan Residual fragments < 4 mm Score vs clearance %: Score vs complication %: Univariate analysis and logistic regression
5–7 = 100% 5 = 0%
8 = 80% 6 = 1.6%
9 = 94.1% 7–8 = 0%
10 = 79.2% 9 = 0.8%
11 = 66.7% 10 = 6.6%
12 = 45% 11–12 = 0%
Noureldin YA et al27 Canada 185 Unclear Plain radiographs or noncontrast CT Asymptomatic residual fragments < 4 mm Overall, 71.9% Overall, 16.2% Logistic regression analysis
5 = 100% 5 = 20%
6 = 75% 6 = 18.2%
7 = 77.3% 7 = 11.4%
8 = 67.6% 8 = 20.6%
9 = 79.3% 9 = 20.7%
10 = 58.3% 10 = 8.3%
11 = 42.9% 11 = 0%
12–13 = 0% 12 = 25%
13 = 0%
Noureldin YA et al28 Canada 155 Noncontrast CT KUB and/or non-contrast CT Residual stones ≥ 4 mm considered as non-stone-free Overall, 71.6% Overall, 15.5% Multivariate logistic regression
Significant inverse association between S.T.O.N.E. score and clearance AUC = 0.63 No correlation between S.T.O.N.E. score and complications
Seoul Renal Stone Complexity Score
Jeong CW et al10 South Korea 155 Noncontrast CT No evidence of residual stones on postop images after 1 mo Overall, 72.3% Overall, 25.2% Univariate analysis; ROCs
Low (1–2), 96%; medium (3–4), 69%; high (5–9), 28% Low (1–2), 1.9%; medium (3–4), 28.6%; high (5–9), 34.2%
Choo MS et al31 South Korea 327 Noncontrast CT Complete clearance/clearance with clinically insignificant residual fragments (4 mm) at 1 mo follow-up imaging Overall, 65.4% Not investigated Univariate and multivariate regression analyses; ROCs
Low (1–2), 83.9%; medium (3–4), 47.6%; high (5–9), 21.4%
Park J et al32 South Korea 159 Unclear No evidence of a stone or with clinically insignificant residual fragment stones < 2 mm Overall, 73.0% Not investigated Uni- and multivariate linear regression
Low (1–2), 86.7%; medium (3–4), 70.2%; high (5–12), 48.6%
a

Study focuses on interobserver reliability.

AUC, area under the curve; CT, computed tomography; IVU, intravenous urogram; KUB, kidneys, ureters, and bladder; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SFS, stone-free status; S.T.O.N.E., stone size, tract length, obstruction, number of involved calices, and essence/stone density; USS, abdominal and pelvic ultrasound.