Table 2.
Attitudes expressed by Ill individuals† | Preferred alternative decision maker predictions of attitudes expressed by ill individuals†† | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Importance of issue in relation to treatment decisions* | mean | sd | mean | sd | p-value |
Issues related to the role of the ill individual | |||||
include ill person in decisions | 8.5 | (0.8) | 8.6 | (0.6) | 0.76 |
ill person free to do what he wants | 7.5 | (2.3) | 8.8 | (0.4) | 0.01** |
ill person able to decide to continue or stop treatment | 7.2 | (2.7) | 8.3 | (1.0) | 0.09 |
Overall mean*** | 7.7 | (0.7) | 8.6 | (0.3) | 0.15 |
Issues related to the role of family | |||||
include family members in decisions | 7.3 | (1.7) | 7.8 | (1.7) | 0.13 |
family’s understanding of how the treatment will affect ill person | 7.1 | (2.5) | 6.9 | (2.4) | 0.74 |
family having to take care of ill person during the treatment | 6.9 | (2.3) | 6.6 | (2.5) | 0.60 |
what family recommends | 6.8 | (1.7) | 7.1 | (2.0) | 0.15 |
family able to decide to continue or to stop treatment | 6.0 | (2.8) | 6.9 | (2.4) | 0.13 |
Overall mean** | 6.8 | (0.5) | 7.1 | (0.5) | 0.34 |
1 missing observation from ill individual;
1 missing observation from alternative decision maker
Items were rated on a 9-point scale ranging from “not at all important” = 1 to “very important” = 9
Statistically significant with α = 0.05
Accuracy of prediction by preferred alternative decision makers of people with mental illness regarding treatment decisions, as evidenced by lack of differences