Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jan 26;34(5):674–681. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.01.003

Table 4.

Univariate Cox Proportional Hazard analysis of clinical, biopsy and imaging variables for the prediction of treatment failure in 262 patients with 35 treatment failures. HR = Hazards ratio. REF indicates the reference category to which the other categories are compared. For the continuous variables, the Hazards ratio indicates the percentage increase in the chance of a treatment failure event for a unit increase in the variable. For example, a 1.07 HR for age at diagnosis indicates that the chance of treatment failure increases by 7% for every year of increase in age. For the categorized variables, the HR indicates the percentage increase in the chance of TF compared to the reference category. All variables were significant (p < 0.05-p < 0.0001).

Variable type Variable Category N HR [95% CI]
Clinical Age at Diagnosis 1.07 [1.01–1.13]
Pre-treatment PSA 1.09 [1.03–1.15]
Clinical Stage T1–T2 244 REF
T3–T4 18 8.17 [3.99–16.75]
Biopsy Gleason Score ≤ 3+4 227 REF
> 3+4 35 8.13 [4.18–15.81]
NCCN-based clinical risk score (CRS) low 132 REF
intermediate 102 2.51 [0.99–6.37]
high 28 15.36 [6.29–37.48]
Biopsy Core # negative cores (NNC) 0.86 [0.78–0.95]
Data # positive cores (NPC) 1.28 [1.16–1.41]
% of cores positive 1.03 [1.02–1.04]
MRI MRI Stage
1–3 235 REF
4–7 27 6.57 [3.25–13.26]
MRSI # of index lesion voxels (NILV) 1.08 [1.06–1.11]
# of high grade (HG) voxels (NHGV) 1.14 [1.08–1.21]
# of undetectable polyamine voxels (NUPV) 1.11 [1.07–1.16]