Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2016 Feb 5;7(2):182–189. doi: 10.1007/s13239-016-0256-z

Table 3.

AUC for each method as a function of segment size, using 25-fold cross-validation

RR intervals AFD (95% CI) KS (95% CI) SD (95% CI) Med (95% CI)
7 0.9942 (0.9873–1.0000) 0.9434 (0.9307–0.9561) 0.9797 (0.9715–0.9879) 0.9523 (0.9410–0.9636)
15 0.9977 (0.9955–0.9999) 0.9894 (0.9862–0.9926) 0.9892 (0.9840–0.9944) 0.9697 (0.9603–0.9791)
21 0.9973 (0.9939–1.0000) 0.9938 (0.9918–0.9958) 0.9908 (0.9858–0.9958) 0.9734 (0.9649–0.9819)
33 0.9980 (0.9966–0.9994) 0.9965 (0.9949–0.9981) 0.9926 (0.9881–0.9971) 0.9775 (0.9697–0.9853)
101 0.9992 (0.9986–0.9998) 0.9986 (0.9978–0.9994) 0.9925 (0.9877–0.9973) 0.9829 (0.9752–0.9906)

AUC – Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AFD – current algorithm, KS – Kolmogorov-Smirnov test compared to stored template histograms, SD – standard deviation of RR intervals, Med – Median difference of adjacent RR intervals, CI – Confidence interval