Advantages |
Examples |
Author |
|
Acceptability |
Positive acceptance |
Chaiyachat et al, 2013; Surka et al., 2014 |
|
Fuel savings |
Chang et al, 2013 |
|
Unrestricted use generated a sense of ownership and empowerment |
Little et al, 2013 |
Data Quality |
Improved data quality |
Gisore et al, 2012; Surka et al., 2014 |
|
Increased subject enrollment |
Gisore et al, 2012 Mamud et al, 2010 |
Cost |
Maintenance was inexpensive, after an initial capital cost |
Gisore et al, 2012; Chaplin et al., |
|
Disadvantages |
Examples |
Author |
|
Acceptability |
Low actual use, despite positive acceptance |
Chaiyachat et al, 2013 |
|
Concerns with job security |
Chang et al, 2013 |
|
Limited personal motivation to use the phone without incentive |
Chaiyachat et al, 2013 |
|
Patient confidentiality problems, especially when phones are shared between family members |
Chang et al, 2013 Haberer et al, 2010 Velez et al, 2013 |
|
Interferes with the human side of the community health worker and patient interaction |
Chang et al, 2013 |
|
Community health workers feared making mistakes |
Haberer et al, 2010 |
Usability |
Application updates were disruptive and caused screen freezing |
Chaiyachat et al, 2013 |
|
Patients registered multiple times |
Little et al, 2013 |
|
Small keyboard caused data entry errors |
Velez et al, 2013 |
Technical Infrastructure |
Limited internet access made it difficult to upload data Graphic presentation of data on phones inferior to paper |
Chaiyachat et al, 2013 Chang et al, 2013 Surka et al., 2014 |
|
Limited electricity caused problems with battery charging |
Chang et al, 2013 |
|
Some phones were lost, stolen, or damaged, but this was rare. Some community health workers were worried that smartphones would make them a target for theft. |
Chang et al, 2013 Little et al, 2013 Gisore et al, 2012 |
|
Group 2: Communication between a health worker and patient |
|
Advantages |
Examples |
Author |
|
Acceptability |
Fuel savings |
Mamud et al, 2010 |
Health outcome |
Higher odds of skilled delivery attendance |
Lund et al, 2012 |
Data Quality |
Increased subject enrollment |
Mamud et al, 2010 |
|
Group 3: Communication between a health worker in the field and a health worker at a higher institution |
|
Advantages |
Examples |
Author |
|
Acceptability |
Improved morale |
Chang et al, 2011 |
|
High acceptance among community health workers |
Jones et al, 2012 |
Usability |
Decrease in time to contact and receive feedback from supervisor |
Lemay et al, 2012 |
|
Increased subject enrollment |
Ngabo et al, 2012 |
Health outcome |
Improved patient compliance when they realized direct accountability to clinic |
Chang et al, 2011 |
|
Improved medication management |
Zurovac et al, 2011 |
Data Quality |
Enhanced protocol compliance |
Florez-arango et al, 2014 |
Cost |
Decrease in costs, mostly due to a decrease in travel expense |
Lemay et al, 2012 |
|
Disadvantages |
Examples |
Author |
|
Usability |
Health worker concern with becoming desensitized to repetitive and frequent messages |
Jones et al, 2012 |
Health outcome |
No demonstrated impact on medication adherence |
Bruxvoort et al., 2014 |
|
Group 4: Data collection for surveillance or research-based purposes |
|
Advantages |
Examples |
Author |
Acceptability |
High acceptance among interviewers |
VanHerden et al, 2013 |
Usability |
Convenient to carry around because of small size |
Onono et al, 2011 |
|
Technology facilitated interaction with interviewees |
Rajput et al, 2012 |
Data Quality |
Improved data quality Limited to no errors |
Onono et al, 2011 Zhang et al, 2012 |
|
Real time information allowed identification of technical issues, data entry issues, and data fabrication |
Tomlinson et al, 2009 |
Cost |
Technology was more cost efficient that pen-and-paper surveys because data entry was not required |
Rajput et al, 2012 Tomlinson et al, 2009 |
|
Disadvantages |
Examples |
Author |
|
Technical Infrastructure |
Limited electricity caused problems with battery charging |
Onono et al, 2011 |
|
Limited internet access made it difficult to upload data |
Onono et al, 2011 |
Cost |
High initial capital costs |
Zhang et al, 2012 |