Table 4. Spearman’s rank correlation.
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gender | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
2 | Age | 0.19 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
3 | Marital status | 0.25 | 0.32 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
4 | Education level | 0.21 | 0.27 | −0.35 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
5 | Experience | 0.16 | 0.28* | 0.31 | 0.27 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
6 | Pay | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
7 | Promotion | 0.23 | −0.37 | 0.24 | −0.17** | 0.27 | 0.17 | 1.00 | |||||||||
8 | Supervisory support | 0.24 | −0.17 | 0.14* | 0.18 | −0.37 | −0.16 | 0.31 | 1.00 | ||||||||
9 | Fringe benefits | 0.14 | 0.18** | −0.17 | 0.15 | −0.17* | 0.24 | 0.28 | −0.15 | 1.00 | |||||||
10 | Contingent rewards | −0.17 | 0.15 | 0.14* | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.27* | −0.14* | 0.17 | 1.00 | ||||||
11 | Operating conditions | −0.15 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.24 | −0.17 | 0.23 | 0.24 | −0.17 | 0.23* | 0.31 | 1.00 | |||||
12 | Coworkers | −0.26 | −0.18 | 0.27 | 0.14 | −0.15 | 0.24 | 0.14** | −0.15 | 0.24 | 0.23* | 0.18 | 1.00 | ||||
13 | Work environment | −0.27 | −0.17 | −0.37 | −0.17 | −0.24 | 0.28 | −0.17 | −0.24 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 1.00 | |||
14 | Communication | 0.18 | 0.25 | −0.17 | −0.15 | −0.18 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.24 | −0.17 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.15 | 1.00 | ||
15 | Job satisfaction | 0.60 | 0.31** | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.66** | 0.87*** | 0.67*** | 0.64** | 0.84*** | 0.55*** | 0.74*** | 0.53*** | −0.75** | 0.59** | 1.00 | |
16 | Intention to quit | 0.18 | −0.37*** | 0.17 | 0.57*** | −0.45** | −0.17 | −0.26 | 0.14 | −0.17 | −0.24 | 0.28 | 0.24 | −0.21 | 0.19 | −0.57** | 1.00 |
Notes.
P < 0.05 level (two-tailed).
P < 0.01 level (two-tailed).
P < 0.001 level (two-tailed).