Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;4:e1896. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1896

Table 5. Stepwise backward logistic regression of intention to quit.

B SE Wald (d.f. = 1) P OR (95%CI)
Model 1a
Age −0.07 0.01 11.01 0.001 0.92 (0.74–0.85)
Education level 0.95 0.47 4.62 0.029 2.47 (1.12–5.78)
Job satisfaction −0.91 0.37 5.91 0.001 0.33 (1.24–0.65)
Constant 5.07 1.41 8.82 0.002
−2 log likelihood 142.08
Correct classification rate (%) 64.47
Model 2b
Age −0.07 0.01 11.24 0.001 0.92 (0.74–0.85)
Education level 0.87 0.34 5.24 0.011 2.34 (1.05–0.95)
Supervisory support −0.56 0.17 4.89 0.001 0.71 (0.54–0.87)
Work environment −0.54 0.25 6.34 0.034 0.82 (0.42–0.97)
Coworkers −0.72 0.36 4.42 0.042 0.43 (0.14–2.65)
Constant 6.95 2.07 8.99 0.008
−2 log likelihood 135.85
Correct classification rate (%) 66.12

Notes.

a

Variables entered: gender, age, marital status, education level, experience (step 1); job satisfaction (step 2).

b

Variables entered: gender, age, marital status, education level, experience (step 1); satisfaction, pay, promotion, supervisory support, fringe benefits, contingent rewards, operating conditions, coworkers, work environment, communication (step 2).