Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;4:e1985. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1985

Table 3. Analyses of variance of some of the most abundant taxonomic groups in each treatment.

Site (Si) was random with 2 levels. Habitat type (Ha) and Contaminant (Contam) were fixed and orthogonal, with 2 and 5 levels, respectively; n = 3. Data were pooled when p > 0.25.

Source df Bivalvest Amphipods
MS Pseudo-F MS Pseudo-F
Site (Si) 1 2.5 11.85** 16.0 52.84**
Habitat type (Ha) 1 0.7 3.13ns 0.2 0.61ns
Contaminant (Contam) 4
C1—Control vs Carbaryl 1 0.1 0.49ns 0.0 0.00ns
C2—Control vs Iron 1 0 .0 0.42ns 0.0 0.00ns
C3—Control vs Metal 1 0.0 0.20ns 0.0 0.00ns
C4—Control vs Blank 1 0.2 0.91ns 0.0 0.00ns
Ha × Contam 4
Ha × C1 1 1.3 5.28* 1.0 4.56*
Ha × C2 1 0.6 3.23ns 1.0 3.09ns
Ha × C3 1 0.8 3.01ns 1.3 4.15ns
Ha × C4 1 1.1 5.79* 0.2 0.82ns
Pooled 49 0.2 0.3
Total 59
Pair-wise tests Not conclusive

Notes.

ns, not significant (p > 0.05).

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

t

= data were log(x + 1) transformed when Cochran’s test p < 0.05.