Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 5;67(13):1544–1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.045

Table 3. Consistency of H2RA Use and LV Changes*.

Change in LV Parameters Relative to Baseline Exam (n = 2,806)
Change 95% CI
Change in LV end-diastolic volume
 No H2RA use -10.9 ml -11.7 to -10.0 mL
 H2RA use at only 1 study exam -8.8 ml -14.4 to -3.2 mL
 Consistent H2RA use at 4+ study exams 0.8 ml -8.1 to 9.6 mL
Test of trend: p = 0.02
Change in LV ejection fraction
 No H2RA use -0.7% -1.0 to -0.4
 H2RA use at only 1ne study exam -0.1% -1.9 to 1.8
 Consistent H2RA use at 4+ study exams 0.0% -3.0 to 2.9
Test of trend: p = 0.61
Change in LV stroke volume
 No H2RA use -8.3 ml -9.0 to -7.7
 H2RA use at only 1 study exam -5.8 ml -10.1 to -1.5
 Consistent H2RA use at 4+ study exams -0.8 ml -7.6 to 5.9
Test of trend: p = 0.04
Change in LV mass
 No H2RA use 2.9 g 2.2 to 3.6 g
 H2RA use at only 1 study exam 0.7 g -3.8 to 5.2 g
 Consistent H2RA use at 4+ study exams 6.3 g -0.8 to 13.3
Test of trend: p = 0.60
Change in LV Mass/Volume Ratio
 No H2RA use 0.12 g/ml 0.11 to 0.13
 H2RA use at only one study exam 0.08 g/ml 0.03 to 0.13
 Consistent H2RA use at 4+ study exams 0.04 g/ml -0.03 to 0.12
Test of trend: p = 0.02
*

Changes between the initial and the follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) exam.

All models fully adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, height, weight, study site, the sum of the left ventricular (LV) parameter of interest at CMR 1 and CMR 2, education, cigarette smoking, pack-years, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, cholesterol, glucose, and daily exercise.

Other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.