Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;6:25582. doi: 10.1038/srep25582

Table 2. Comparison between GISTIC and WIFA-Seq for GBM.

Chr Genes WIFA
GISTIC
cluster.start cluster.end cluster.length FDC peak.start peak.end peak.length
1 MDM4 203277901 205825501 2547601 1|2|3|4|5 204334766 204529807 195042
4 FGFR3 737301 2108301 1371001 5      
4 PDGFRA 52663201 56488401 3825201 1|2|3|4|5 55140876 55218386 77511
6 QKI 162272701 164169001 1896301 1|2|3|4|5 163767962 165698161 1930200
7 EGFR 53982101 56449401 2467301 1|2|3|4|5      
7 CDK6 91140201 92642101 1501901 4|5 92240329 92427373 187045
9 CDKN2A 19626001 29431601 9805601 1|2|3|4|5 21959052 21976869 17818
9 CDKN2B 19626001 29431601 9805601 1|2|3|4|5      
10 PTEN 88984001 90359501 1375501 1|2|3|4|5 89617158 90034038 416881
12 CCND2 3257601 4622101 1364501 4|5 4374374 4436676 62303
12 CDK4 56919201 59971201 3052001 1|2|3|4|5 58125396 58162738 37343
12 MDM2 69038101 69416901 378801 1|2|3|4|5 69178021 69260755 82735

For both methods, genes were included in clusters/peaks. Thus, start and end positions and the length of clusters/peaks are specified. A column FDC indicates FDCs that identified the given genes.