Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;6:25582. doi: 10.1038/srep25582

Table 4. Comparison between GISTIC and WIFA-Seq for OV.

Chr Genes WIFA
GISTIC
cluster.start cluster.end cluster.length FDC peak.start peak.end peak.length
1 MYCL 38952601 41868301 2915701 1|2|3|4|5 39231800 41878565 2646766
1 MCL1 147794101 151448201 3654101 4|5      
3 MECOM 160721001 178997301 18276301 1|2|3|4|5      
4 TACC3 1743701 10725801 8982101 1|2|3|4|5      
4 ANKRD17 69261001 75913501 6652501 1|2|3|4|5      
5 TERT 9901 1850001 1840101 4|5      
8 SOX17 54155101 55670501 1515401 4|5      
8 MYC 124682001 137671301 12989301 1|2|3|4|5 126952807 132241106 5288300
10 PTEN 85985501 91954501 5969001 1|2|3|4|5 84746048 100217807 15471760
11 ALG8 65642401 85427201 19784801 1|2|3|4|5      
12 KRAS 22892501 27931501 5039001 1|2|3|4|5      
13 RB1 47517901 49138401 1620501 2|3|4|5 48833767 53194688 4360922
14 METTL17 20540801 23461401 2920601 1|2|3|4|5      
17 NF1 29302301 29948501 646201 2|3|4|5      
19 CCNE1 27731701 31299201 3567501 1|2|3|4|5 30258695 30343163 84469

For both methods, genes were included in clusters/peaks. Thus, start and end positions and the length of clusters/peaks are specified. A column FDC indicates FDCs that identified the given genes.