Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;7:665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00665

Table 6.

Descriptive and comparative analysis between groups on the CIT scenarios.

Schizophrenia patients (n = 54) First-degree relatives (n = 43) Healthy controls (n = 44) Statistic p-value
(1) Upset—spatial nearly happened event, n (%) χ2 = 12.24a 0.014

Target counterfactual response 20 (37.7) 10 (23.3) 9 (20.5)
Non-target response 9 (17.0) 5 (11.6) 1 (2.3)
Same/can’t tell 24 (45.3) 28 (65.1) 34 (77.3)

(2) Regret—unusual event, n (%) χ2 = 9.60 0.048

Target counterfactual response 19 (35.8) 26 (60.5) 21 (47.7)
Non-target response 20 (37.7) 7 (16.3) 8 (18.2)
Same/can’t tell 14 (26.4) 10 (23.3) 15 (34.1)

(3) Rumination—temporal nearly happened event, n (%) χ2 = 2.91 0.573

Target counterfactual response 27 (50.9) 25 (58.1) 25 (56.8)
Non-target response 18 (34.0) 10 (23.3) 9 (20.5)
Same/can’t tell 8 (15.1) 8 (18.6) 10 (22.7)

(4) Judgments of avoidance—unusual event, n (%) χ2 = 12.24 0.036

Target counterfactual response 31 (58.5) 31 (72.1) 20 (45.5)
Non-target response 11 (20.8) 2 (4.7) 7 (15.9)
Same/can’t tell 11 (20.8) 10 (23.3) 17 (38.6)

Comparisons across groups in the study were made using the χ2-test unless otherwise specified. aFisher’s Exact Test.