Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;6:25662. doi: 10.1038/srep25662

Table 4. Comparisons of covariate-adjusted mean of bone mineral density by different aMed models (N = 2371).

  Whole body Lumbar spine Total hip Femur neck Trochanter Intertrochanter Ward’s triangle
BMD, g/cm2a
aMed score, Model I
 Quintiles 1a 1.081 ± 0.005 0.864 ± 0.006 0.821 ± 0.005 0.677 ± 0.005 0.610 ± 0.004 0.983 ± 0.006 0.495 ± 0.006
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.021 ± 0.005 0.026 ± 0.006 0.023 ± 0.005 0.024 ± 0.005 0.016 ± 0.004 0.028 ± 0.006 0.014 ± 0.006
 %Diff. Ic 1.94* 3.01* 2.80** 2.81* 2.62** 2.85** 2.83
aMed score, Model II
 Quintiles 1a 1.083 ± 0.004 0.870 ± 0.006 0.822 ± 0.004 0.680 ± 0.004 0.611 ± 0.003 0.985 ± 0.005 0.497 ± 0.004
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.018 ± 0.004 0.021 ± 0.005 0.022 ± 0.004 0.018±0.004 0.016 ± 0.003 0.026 ± 0.004 0.017 ± 0.004
 %Diff. IIc 1.66** 2.41** 2.67** 2.65** 2.62** 2.64** 3.42
aMed score, Model III
 Quintiles 1a 1.082 ± 0.004 0.866 ± 0.005 0.822 ± 0.004 0.677 ± 0.004 0.610 ± 0.003 0.984 ± 0.005 0.495 ± 0.005
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.023 ± 0.004 0.025±0.005 0.024 ± 0.004 0.022 ± 0.004 0.017 ± 0.003 0.029 ± 0.003 0.018 ± 0.003
 %Diff. IIIc 2.13*** 2.89** 2.92*** 3.25*** 2.79** 2.95** 3.64
aMed score, Model IV
 Quintiles 1a 1.081 ± 0.004 0.866 ± 0.005 0.820 ± 0.004 0.677 ± 0.004 0.610 ± 0.003 0.981 ± 0.005 0.494 ± 0.005
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.020 ± 0.004 0.025 ± 0.006 0.024 ± 0.004 0.021 ± 0.004 0.015 ± 0.003 0.031 ± 0.005 0.016 ± 0.005
 %Diff. IVc 1.85** 2.89** 2.93*** 3.10** 2.46* 3.16*** 3.24
aMed score, Model V
 Quintiles 1a 1.082 ± 0.004 0.869±0.005 0.821 ± 0.004 0.680 ± 0.004 0.611 ± 0.003 0.982 ± 0.005 0.495 ± 0.005
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.022 ± 0.004 0.020 ± 0.006 0.020 ± 0.004 0.017 ± 0.004 0.013 ± 0.004 0.026 ± 0.005 0.015 ± 0.005
 %Diff. Vc 2.03** 2.30 2.44** 2.50* 2.13 2.65** 3.03
aMed score, Model VI
 Quintiles 1a 1.080±0.005 0.864 ± 0.006 0.821 ± 0.005 0.677 ± 0.005 0.610 ± 0.004 0.983 ± 0.006 0.495 ± 0.005
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.022 ± 0.004 0.027 ± 0.006 0.023 ± 0.004 0.019 ± 0.004 0.017 ± 0.004 0.028 ± 0.005 0.014±0.005
 %Diff. VIc 2.03** 3.11* 2.80** 2.79* 2.78* 2.85** 2.83
aMed score, Model VII
 Quintiles 1a 1.076 ± 0.007 0.857 ± 0.009 0.820 ± 0.007 0.680 ± 0.006 0.610 ± 0.006 0.980 ± 0.008 0.495 ± 0.008
 Quintiles 5 (highest) Diff.b 0.046±0.007 0.056 ± 0.009 0.039 ± 0.007 0.037 ± 0.006 0.027 ± 0.006 0.051 ± 0.008 0.035 ± 0.008
 %Diff. VIIc 4.28*** 6.53*** 4.76*** 5.44*** 4.43** 5.20*** 7.07*
 %Diff. incrementd 121 117 70.0 93.6 69.1 82.5 150

All analyses were adjusted for age, body mass index, marital status, education status, household income, smoking status, calcium supplement use, multivitamin use, physical activity, and daily energy intake. In Model I, aMed scores were constructed by the original 9 components (whole grain, vegetables excluded potato, fruits include juices, legumes, nuts, fish, monounsaturated to saturated fat ratio, red and processed meat, and moderate alcohol consume). Vegetable, legumes, fish, monounsaturated to saturated ratio, moderate alcohol consume was each excluded from Model I in Model II, III, IV, V, VI, respectively, and excluded together in the Model VII. Score ranges from 0–9, 0–8, 0–8, 0–8, 0–8, 0–8, and 0–4, respectively in Model I–VII.

aMean ± SE.

bMean difference (Q5–Q1) ± SE.

c%Diff.: percentage difference = (Q5-Q1)/Q1 × 100%.

d%Diff. increment = ([%Diff.VII–%Diff.I])/%Diff.I) × 100%. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, compared with Q1.