Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0078-8

Table 3.

Estimates, standard errors (SE), and 2.5–97.5 % confidence limits based on model-averaging from the across-hypotheses model selection of (A) breeding territories vs. control areas (n = 73 pairs) and (B) breeding territories (n = 56) vs. abandoned territories (n = 20)

Hypothesis Variable Estimate SE 2.5 % 97.5 %
(a) Forest structure
     Ground variables Cover of herb layer (lin. term) 0.98 0.45 0.09 1.87
Cover of herb layer (quad. term) −0.71 0.28 −1.25 −0.16
Number of bushes −0.58 0.37 −1.31 0.15
Number of tussocks 1.78 0.81 0.18 3.37
     Tree variables Number of trees 0.94 0.31 0.32 1.55
Tree dbh −0.48 0.31 −1.09 0.13
Tree species diversity (lin. term) −0.22 0.27 −0.75 0.31
Tree species diversity (quad. term) 0.27 0.21 −0.13 0.67
    Topography Slope steepness 0.91 0.28 0.35 1.46
    Rodent-avoidance Rodent numbers −0.60 0.30 −1.19 −0.01
(b) Forest structure
     Tree variables Number of trees 1.72 0.70 0.36 3.09
    Disturbance Distance to forest edge 3.58 1.52 0.60 6.57
    Topography Slope steepness 2.20 0.76 0.71 3.68

Shown are variables included in the highest ranking models and in models with ΔAICc < 2 to the highest ranking ones

Lin linear; quad quadratic