Table 3.
Estimates, standard errors (SE), and 2.5–97.5 % confidence limits based on model-averaging from the across-hypotheses model selection of (A) breeding territories vs. control areas (n = 73 pairs) and (B) breeding territories (n = 56) vs. abandoned territories (n = 20)
| Hypothesis | Variable | Estimate | SE | 2.5 % | 97.5 % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Forest structure | |||||
| Ground variables | Cover of herb layer (lin. term) | 0.98 | 0.45 | 0.09 | 1.87 |
| Cover of herb layer (quad. term) | −0.71 | 0.28 | −1.25 | −0.16 | |
| Number of bushes | −0.58 | 0.37 | −1.31 | 0.15 | |
| Number of tussocks | 1.78 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 3.37 | |
| Tree variables | Number of trees | 0.94 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 1.55 |
| Tree dbh | −0.48 | 0.31 | −1.09 | 0.13 | |
| Tree species diversity (lin. term) | −0.22 | 0.27 | −0.75 | 0.31 | |
| Tree species diversity (quad. term) | 0.27 | 0.21 | −0.13 | 0.67 | |
| Topography | Slope steepness | 0.91 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 1.46 |
| Rodent-avoidance | Rodent numbers | −0.60 | 0.30 | −1.19 | −0.01 |
| (b) Forest structure | |||||
| Tree variables | Number of trees | 1.72 | 0.70 | 0.36 | 3.09 |
| Disturbance | Distance to forest edge | 3.58 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 6.57 |
| Topography | Slope steepness | 2.20 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 3.68 |
Shown are variables included in the highest ranking models and in models with ΔAICc < 2 to the highest ranking ones
Lin linear; quad quadratic