. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 9.

Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Mar 8;52(1):17–24. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150985

Table 2.

Satisfaction Results

Satisfaction Question	Mean Score^* (Range)
Satisfaction Question	Patient	Family Member
The mock PET scan results session was easy to follow.	1.9 (1–4)	1.3 (1–2)
The mock PET scan results session was too long.	4.2 (3–5)	4.1 (1–5)
The mock PET scan results session included just about the right level of detail.	2.1 (2–3)	1.8 (1–3)
The information provided in the mock PET scan results session was clearly presented.	1.7 (1–2)	1.4 (1–2)
After the PET scan results session, I still had questions about my (or my loved one's) mock results.	3.4 (2–5)	3.2 (1–5)
The visual materials, like graphs, used in the mock PET scan results session were clear.	2.2 (1–4)	1.7 (1–3)
The length of the mock PET scan results session was just about right.	1.8 (1–2)	2.0 (1–4)
The mock PET scan results session included too much detail	4.4 (4–5)	4.0 (2–5)

1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree