Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Jan 22;58(1):17–30. doi: 10.1111/jir.12009

Table 5.

Regression analyses with child behaviour problems and ID–TD group status (Models 1 and 2)

Variable B SE B β
Dependent variable: child resistance
Status at age 9 0.51 0.25 0.19*
 Status at age 9 0.43 0.26 0.16
 Mother reported total CBCL (age 9) 0.01 0.01 0.08
Dependent variable: child expression/negotiation
Status at age 9 1.0 0.19 0.45***
Status at age 9 0.90 0.20 0.40***
 Mother reported total CBCL (age 9) −0.01 0.01 −0.13
Dependent variable: mother directiveness
Status at age 9 0.43 0.13 0.29**
Status at age 9 0.52 0.14 0.35***
 Mother reported total CBCL (age 9) −0.01 0.01 −0.16
*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01,

***

P < 0.001, bold results P < 0.05.

Model 1 (the first row of each dependent variable) is status entered on its own; Model 2 (the second and third rows of each dependent variable) is the final model with status and behaviour problems entered together.

TD, typical development; ID, intellectual disability; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist.