Table 5.
Variable | B | SE B | β |
---|---|---|---|
Dependent variable: child resistance | |||
Status at age 9 | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.19* |
Status at age 9 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 0.16 |
Mother reported total CBCL (age 9) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
Dependent variable: child expression/negotiation | |||
Status at age 9 | −1.0 | 0.19 | −0.45*** |
Status at age 9 | −0.90 | 0.20 | −0.40*** |
Mother reported total CBCL (age 9) | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.13 |
Dependent variable: mother directiveness | |||
Status at age 9 | 0.43 | 0.13 | 0.29** |
Status at age 9 | 0.52 | 0.14 | 0.35*** |
Mother reported total CBCL (age 9) | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.16 |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001, bold results P < 0.05.
Model 1 (the first row of each dependent variable) is status entered on its own; Model 2 (the second and third rows of each dependent variable) is the final model with status and behaviour problems entered together.
TD, typical development; ID, intellectual disability; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist.