Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2016 Apr 30;76(5):245. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4088-7

Production of K(892)0 and ϕ(1020) in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV

J Adam 40, D Adamová 84, M M Aggarwal 88, G Aglieri Rinella 36, M Agnello 110, N Agrawal 48, Z Ahammed 132, S Ahmad 19, S U Ahn 68, S Aiola 136, A Akindinov 58, S N Alam 132, D Aleksandrov 80, B Alessandro 110, D Alexandre 101, R Alfaro Molina 64, A Alici 12,104, A Alkin 3, J R M Almaraz 119, J Alme 38, T Alt 43, S Altinpinar 18, I Altsybeev 131, C Alves Garcia Prado 120, C Andrei 78, A Andronic 97, V Anguelov 94, T Antičić 98, F Antinori 107, P Antonioli 104, L Aphecetche 113, H Appelshäuser 53, S Arcelli 28, R Arnaldi 110, O W Arnold 37,93, I C Arsene 22, M Arslandok 53, B Audurier 113, A Augustinus 36, R Averbeck 97, M D Azmi 19, A Badalà 106, Y W Baek 67, S Bagnasco 110, R Bailhache 53, R Bala 91, S Balasubramanian 136, A Baldisseri 15, R C Baral 61, A M Barbano 27, R Barbera 29, F Barile 33, G G Barnaföldi 135, L S Barnby 101, V Barret 70, P Bartalini 7, K Barth 36, J Bartke 117, E Bartsch 53, M Basile 28, N Bastid 70, S Basu 132, B Bathen 54, G Batigne 113, A Batista Camejo 70, B Batyunya 66, P C Batzing 22, I G Bearden 81, H Beck 53, C Bedda 110, N K Behera 50, I Belikov 55, F Bellini 28, H Bello Martinez 2, R Bellwied 122, R Belmont 134, E Belmont-Moreno 64, V Belyaev 75, P Benacek 84, G Bencedi 135, S Beole 27, I Berceanu 78, A Bercuci 78, Y Berdnikov 86, D Berenyi 135, R A Bertens 57, D Berzano 36, L Betev 36, A Bhasin 91, I R Bhat 91, A K Bhati 88, B Bhattacharjee 45, J Bhom 128, L Bianchi 122, N Bianchi 72, C Bianchin 57,134, J Bielčík 40, J Bielčíková 84, A Bilandzic 37,81,93, G Biro 135, R Biswas 4,79, S Biswas 79, S Bjelogrlic 57, J T Blair 118, D Blau 80, C Blume 53, F Bock 74,94, A Bogdanov 75, H Bøggild 81, L Boldizsár 135, M Bombara 41, J Book 53, H Borel 15, A Borissov 96, M Borri 83,124, F Bossú 65, E Botta 27, C Bourjau 81, P Braun-Munzinger 97, M Bregant 120, T Breitner 52, T A Broker 53, T A Browning 95, M Broz 40, E J Brucken 46, E Bruna 110, G E Bruno 33, D Budnikov 99, H Buesching 53, S Bufalino 27,36, P Buncic 36, O Busch 94,128, Z Buthelezi 65, J B Butt 16, J T Buxton 20, D Caffarri 36, X Cai 7, H Caines 136, L Calero Diaz 72, A Caliva 57, E Calvo Villar 102, P Camerini 26, F Carena 36, W Carena 36, F Carnesecchi 28, J Castillo Castellanos 15, A J Castro 125, E A R Casula 25, C Ceballos Sanchez 9, P Cerello 110, J Cerkala 115, B Chang 123, S Chapeland 36, M Chartier 124, J L Charvet 15, S Chattopadhyay 132, S Chattopadhyay 100, A Chauvin 37,93, V Chelnokov 3, M Cherney 87, C Cheshkov 130, B Cheynis 130, V Chibante Barroso 36, D D Chinellato 121, S Cho 50, P Chochula 36, K Choi 96, M Chojnacki 81, S Choudhury 132, P Christakoglou 82, C H Christensen 81, P Christiansen 34, T Chujo 128, S U Chung 96, C Cicalo 105, L Cifarelli 12,28, F Cindolo 104, J Cleymans 90, F Colamaria 33, D Colella 36,59, A Collu 25,74, M Colocci 28, G Conesa Balbastre 71, Z Conesa del Valle 51, M E Connors 136, J G Contreras 40, T M Cormier 85, Y Corrales Morales 110, I Cortés Maldonado 2, P Cortese 32, M R Cosentino 120, F Costa 36, P Crochet 70, R Cruz Albino 11, E Cuautle 63, L Cunqueiro 36,54, T Dahms 37,93, A Dainese 107, M C Danisch 94, A Danu 62, D Das 100, I Das 51,100, S Das 4, A Dash 79,121, S Dash 48, S De 120, A De Caro 12,31, G de Cataldo 103, C de Conti 120, J de Cuveland 43, A De Falco 25, D De Gruttola 12,31, N De Marco 110, S De Pasquale 31, A Deisting 94,97, A Deloff 77, E Dénes 135, C Deplano 82, P Dhankher 48, D Di Bari 33, A Di Mauro 36, P Di Nezza 72, M A Diaz Corchero 10, T Dietel 90, P Dillenseger 53, R Divià 36, Ø Djuvsland 18, A Dobrin 62,82, D Domenicis Gimenez 120, B Dönigus 53, O Dordic 22, T Drozhzhova 53, A K Dubey 132, A Dubla 57, L Ducroux 130, P Dupieux 70, R J Ehlers 136, D Elia 103, E Endress 102, H Engel 52, E Epple 136, B Erazmus 113, I Erdemir 53, F Erhardt 129, B Espagnon 51, M Estienne 113, S Esumi 128, J Eum 96, D Evans 101, S Evdokimov 111, G Eyyubova 40, L Fabbietti 37,93, D Fabris 107, J Faivre 71, A Fantoni 72, M Fasel 74, L Feldkamp 54, A Feliciello 110, G Feofilov 131, J Ferencei 84, A Fernández Téllez 2, E G Ferreiro 17, A Ferretti 27, A Festanti 30, V J G Feuillard 15,70, J Figiel 117, M A S Figueredo 120,124, S Filchagin 99, D Finogeev 56, F M Fionda 25, E M Fiore 33, M G Fleck 94, M Floris 36, S Foertsch 65, P Foka 97, S Fokin 80, E Fragiacomo 109, A Francescon 30,36, U Frankenfeld 97, G G Fronze 27, U Fuchs 36, C Furget 71, A Furs 56, M Fusco Girard 31, J J Gaardhøje 81, M Gagliardi 27, A M Gago 102, M Gallio 27, D R Gangadharan 74, P Ganoti 89, C Gao 7, C Garabatos 97, E Garcia-Solis 13, C Gargiulo 36, P Gasik 37,93, E F Gauger 118, M Germain 113, A Gheata 36, M Gheata 36,62, P Ghosh 132, S K Ghosh 4, P Gianotti 72, P Giubellino 36,110, P Giubilato 30, E Gladysz-Dziadus 117, P Glässel 94, D M Goméz Coral 64, A Gomez Ramirez 52, V Gonzalez 10, P González-Zamora 10, S Gorbunov 43, L Görlich 117, S Gotovac 116, V Grabski 64, O A Grachov 136, L K Graczykowski 133, K L Graham 101, A Grelli 57, A Grigoras 36, C Grigoras 36, V Grigoriev 75, A Grigoryan 1, S Grigoryan 66, B Grinyov 3, N Grion 109, J M Gronefeld 97, J F Grosse-Oetringhaus 36, J-Y Grossiord 130, R Grosso 97, F Guber 56, R Guernane 71, B Guerzoni 28, K Gulbrandsen 81, T Gunji 127, A Gupta 91, R Gupta 91, R Haake 54, Ø Haaland 18, C Hadjidakis 51, M Haiduc 62, H Hamagaki 127, G Hamar 135, J C Hamon 55, J W Harris 136, A Harton 13, D Hatzifotiadou 104, S Hayashi 127, S T Heckel 53, E Hellbär 53, H Helstrup 38, A Herghelegiu 78, G Herrera Corral 11, B A Hess 35, K F Hetland 38, H Hillemanns 36, B Hippolyte 55, D Horak 40, R Hosokawa 128, P Hristov 36, M Huang 18, T J Humanic 20, N Hussain 45, T Hussain 19, D Hutter 43, D S Hwang 21, R Ilkaev 99, M Inaba 128, E Incani 25, M Ippolitov 75,80, M Irfan 19, M Ivanov 97, V Ivanov 86, V Izucheev 111, N Jacazio 28, P M Jacobs 74, M B Jadhav 48, S Jadlovska 115, J Jadlovsky 59,115, C Jahnke 120, M J Jakubowska 133, H J Jang 68, M A Janik 133, P H S Y Jayarathna 122, C Jena 30, S Jena 122, R T Jimenez Bustamante 97, P G Jones 101, A Jusko 101, P Kalinak 59, A Kalweit 36, J Kamin 53, J H Kang 137, V Kaplin 75, S Kar 132, A Karasu Uysal 69, O Karavichev 56, T Karavicheva 56, L Karayan 94,97, E Karpechev 56, U Kebschull 52, R Keidel 138, D L D Keijdener 57, M Keil 36, M Mohisin Khan 19, P Khan 100, S A Khan 132, A Khanzadeev 86, Y Kharlov 111, B Kileng 38, D W Kim 44, D J Kim 123, D Kim 137, H Kim 137, J S Kim 44, M Kim 44, M Kim 137, S Kim 21, T Kim 137, S Kirsch 43, I Kisel 43, S Kiselev 58, A Kisiel 133, G Kiss 135, J L Klay 6, C Klein 53, J Klein 36, C Klein-Bösing 54, S Klewin 94, A Kluge 36, M L Knichel 94, A G Knospe 118,122, C Kobdaj 114, M Kofarago 36, T Kollegger 97, A Kolojvari 131, V Kondratiev 131, N Kondratyeva 75, E Kondratyuk 111, A Konevskikh 56, M Kopcik 115, P Kostarakis 89, M Kour 91, C Kouzinopoulos 36, O Kovalenko 77, V Kovalenko 131, M Kowalski 117, G Koyithatta Meethaleveedu 48, I Králik 59, A Kravčáková 41, M Kretz 43, M Krivda 59,101, F Krizek 84, E Kryshen 36,86, M Krzewicki 43, A M Kubera 20, V Kučera 84, C Kuhn 55, P G Kuijer 82, A Kumar 91, J Kumar 48, L Kumar 88, S Kumar 48, P Kurashvili 77, A Kurepin 56, A B Kurepin 56, A Kuryakin 99, M J Kweon 50, Y Kwon 137, S L La Pointe 110, P La Rocca 29, P Ladron de Guevara 11, C Lagana Fernandes 120, I Lakomov 36, R Langoy 42, C Lara 52, A Lardeux 15, A Lattuca 27, E Laudi 36, R Lea 26, L Leardini 94, G R Lee 101, S Lee 137, F Lehas 82, R C Lemmon 83, V Lenti 103, E Leogrande 57, I León Monzón 119, H León Vargas 64, M Leoncino 27, P Lévai 135, S Li 7,70, X Li 14, J Lien 42, R Lietava 101, S Lindal 22, V Lindenstruth 43, C Lippmann 97, M A Lisa 20, H M Ljunggren 34, D F Lodato 57, P I Loenne 18, V Loginov 75, C Loizides 74, X Lopez 70, E López Torres 9, A Lowe 135, P Luettig 53, M Lunardon 30, G Luparello 26, T H Lutz 136, A Maevskaya 56, M Mager 36, S Mahajan 91, S M Mahmood 22, A Maire 55, R D Majka 136, M Malaev 86, I Maldonado Cervantes 63, L Malinina 66, D Mal’Kevich 58, P Malzacher 97, A Mamonov 99, V Manko 80, F Manso 70, V Manzari 36,103, M Marchisone 27,65,126, J Mareš 60, G V Margagliotti 26, A Margotti 104, J Margutti 57, A Marín 97, C Markert 118, M Marquard 53, N A Martin 97, J Martin Blanco 113, P Martinengo 36, M I Martínez 2, G Martínez García 113, M Martinez Pedreira 36, A Mas 120, S Masciocchi 97, M Masera 27, A Masoni 105, L Massacrier 113, A Mastroserio 33, A Matyja 117, C Mayer 36,117, J Mazer 125, M A Mazzoni 108, D Mcdonald 122, F Meddi 24, Y Melikyan 75, A Menchaca-Rocha 64, E Meninno 31, J Mercado Pérez 94, M Meres 39, Y Miake 128, M M Mieskolainen 46, K Mikhaylov 58,66, L Milano 36,74, J Milosevic 22, L M Minervini 23,103, A Mischke 57, A N Mishra 49, D Miśkowiec 97, J Mitra 132, C M Mitu 62, N Mohammadi 57, B Mohanty 79,132, L Molnar 55,113, L Montaño Zetina 11, E Montes 10, D A Moreira De Godoy 54,113, L A P Moreno 2, S Moretto 30, A Morreale 113, A Morsch 36, V Muccifora 72, E Mudnic 116, D Mühlheim 54, S Muhuri 132, M Mukherjee 132, J D Mulligan 136, M G Munhoz 120, R H Munzer 37,93, H Murakami 127, S Murray 65, L Musa 36, J Musinsky 59, B Naik 48, R Nair 77, B K Nandi 48, R Nania 104, E Nappi 103, M U Naru 16, H Natal da Luz 120, C Nattrass 125, S R Navarro 2, K Nayak 79, R Nayak 84, T K Nayak 132, S Nazarenko 99, A Nedosekin 58, L Nellen 63, F Ng 122, M Nicassio 97, M Niculescu 62, J Niedziela 36, B S Nielsen 81, S Nikolaev 80, S Nikulin 80, V Nikulin 86, F Noferini 12,104, P Nomokonov 66, G Nooren 57, J C C Noris 2, J Norman 124, A Nyanin 80, J Nystrand 18, H Oeschler 94, S Oh 136, S K Oh 67, A Ohlson 36, A Okatan 69, T Okubo 47, L Olah 135, J Oleniacz 133, A C Oliveira Da Silva 120, M H Oliver 136, J Onderwaater 97, C Oppedisano 110, R Orava 46, A Ortiz Velasquez 63, A Oskarsson 34, J Otwinowski 117, K Oyama 76,94, M Ozdemir 53, Y Pachmayer 94, P Pagano 31, G Paić 63, S K Pal 132, J Pan 134, A K Pandey 48, V Papikyan 1, G S Pappalardo 106, P Pareek 49, W J Park 97, S Parmar 88, A Passfeld 54, V Paticchio 103, R N Patra 132, B Paul 100, H Pei 7, T Peitzmann 57, H Pereira Da Costa 15, D Peresunko 75,80, C E Pérez Lara 82, E Perez Lezama 53, V Peskov 53, Y Pestov 5, V Petráček 40, V Petrov 111, M Petrovici 78, C Petta 29, S Piano 109, M Pikna 39, P Pillot 113, L O D L Pimentel 81, O Pinazza 36,104, L Pinsky 122, D B Piyarathna 122, M Płoskoń 74, M Planinic 129, J Pluta 133, S Pochybova 135, P L M Podesta-Lerma 119, M G Poghosyan 85,87, B Polichtchouk 111, N Poljak 129, W Poonsawat 114, A Pop 78, S Porteboeuf-Houssais 70, J Porter 74, J Pospisil 84, S K Prasad 4, R Preghenella 36,104, F Prino 110, C A Pruneau 134, I Pshenichnov 56, M Puccio 27, G Puddu 25, P Pujahari 134, V Punin 99, J Putschke 134, H Qvigstad 22, A Rachevski 109, S Raha 4, S Rajput 91, J Rak 123, A Rakotozafindrabe 15, L Ramello 32, F Rami 55, R Raniwala 92, S Raniwala 92, S S Räsänen 46, B T Rascanu 53, D Rathee 88, K F Read 85,125, K Redlich 77, R J Reed 134, A Rehman 18, P Reichelt 53, F Reidt 36,94, X Ren 7, R Renfordt 53, A R Reolon 72, A Reshetin 56, J-P Revol 12, K Reygers 94, V Riabov 86, R A Ricci 73, T Richert 34, M Richter 22, P Riedler 36, W Riegler 36, F Riggi 29, C Ristea 62, E Rocco 57, M Rodríguez Cahuantzi 2,11, A Rodriguez Manso 82, K Røed 22, E Rogochaya 66, D Rohr 43, D Röhrich 18, R Romita 124, F Ronchetti 36,72, L Ronflette 113, P Rosnet 70, A Rossi 30,36, F Roukoutakis 89, A Roy 49, C Roy 55, P Roy 100, A J Rubio Montero 10, R Rui 26, R Russo 27, E Ryabinkin 80, Y Ryabov 86, A Rybicki 117, S Sadovsky 111, K Šafařík 36, B Sahlmuller 53, P Sahoo 49, R Sahoo 49, S Sahoo 61, P K Sahu 61, J Saini 132, S Sakai 74, M A Saleh 134, J Salzwedel 20, S Sambyal 91, V Samsonov 86, L Šándor 59, A Sandoval 64, M Sano 128, D Sarkar 132, P Sarma 45, E Scapparone 104, F Scarlassara 30, C Schiaua 78, R Schicker 94, C Schmidt 97, H R Schmidt 35, S Schuchmann 53, J Schukraft 36, M Schulc 40, T Schuster 136, Y Schutz 36,113, K Schwarz 97, K Schweda 97, G Scioli 28, E Scomparin 110, R Scott 125, M Šefčík 41, J E Seger 87, Y Sekiguchi 127, D Sekihata 47, I Selyuzhenkov 97, K Senosi 65, S Senyukov 3,36, E Serradilla 10,64, A Sevcenco 62, A Shabanov 56, A Shabetai 113, O Shadura 3, R Shahoyan 36, A Shangaraev 111, A Sharma 91, M Sharma 91, M Sharma 91, N Sharma 125, K Shigaki 47, K Shtejer 9,27, Y Sibiriak 80, S Siddhanta 105, K M Sielewicz 36, T Siemiarczuk 77, D Silvermyr 34, C Silvestre 71, G Simatovic 129, G Simonetti 36, R Singaraju 132, R Singh 79, S Singha 79,132, V Singhal 132, B C Sinha 132, T Sinha 100, B Sitar 39, M Sitta 32, T B Skaali 22, M Slupecki 123, N Smirnov 136, R J M Snellings 57, T W Snellman 123, C Søgaard 34, J Song 96, M Song 137, Z Song 7, F Soramel 30, S Sorensen 125, R D de Souza 121, F Sozzi 97, M Spacek 40, E Spiriti 72, I Sputowska 117, M Spyropoulou-Stassinaki 89, J Stachel 94, I Stan 62, P Stankus 85, G Stefanek 77, E Stenlund 34, G Steyn 65, J H Stiller 94, D Stocco 113, P Strmen 39, A A P Suaide 120, T Sugitate 47, C Suire 51, M Suleymanov 16, M Suljic 26, R Sultanov 58, M Šumbera 84, A Szabo 39, A Szanto de Toledo 120, I Szarka 39, A Szczepankiewicz 36, M Szymanski 133, U Tabassam 16, J Takahashi 121, G J Tambave 18, N Tanaka 128, M A Tangaro 33, M Tarhini 51, M Tariq 19, M G Tarzila 78, A Tauro 36, G Tejeda Muñoz 2, A Telesca 36, K Terasaki 127, C Terrevoli 30, B Teyssier 130, J Thäder 74, D Thomas 118, R Tieulent 130, A R Timmins 122, A Toia 53, S Trogolo 27, G Trombetta 33, V Trubnikov 3, W H Trzaska 123, T Tsuji 127, A Tumkin 99, R Turrisi 107, T S Tveter 22, K Ullaland 18, A Uras 130, G L Usai 25, A Utrobicic 129, M Vajzer 84, M Vala 59, L Valencia Palomo 70, S Vallero 27, J Van Der Maarel 57, J W Van Hoorne 36, M van Leeuwen 57, T Vanat 84, P Vande Vyvre 36, D Varga 135, A Vargas 2, M Vargyas 123, R Varma 48, M Vasileiou 89, A Vasiliev 80, A Vauthier 71, V Vechernin 131, A M Veen 57, M Veldhoen 57, A Velure 18, M Venaruzzo 73, E Vercellin 27, S Vergara Limón 2, R Vernet 8, M Verweij 134, L Vickovic 116, G Viesti 30, J Viinikainen 123, Z Vilakazi 126, O Villalobos Baillie 101, A Villatoro Tello 2, A Vinogradov 80, L Vinogradov 131, Y Vinogradov 99, T Virgili 31, V Vislavicius 34, Y P Viyogi 132, A Vodopyanov 66, M A Völkl 94, K Voloshin 58, S A Voloshin 134, G Volpe 33, B von Haller 36, I Vorobyev 37,93, D Vranic 36,97, J Vrláková 41, B Vulpescu 70, B Wagner 18, J Wagner 97, H Wang 57, M Wang 7,113, D Watanabe 128, Y Watanabe 127, M Weber 36,112, S G Weber 97, D F Weiser 94, J P Wessels 54, U Westerhoff 54, A M Whitehead 90, J Wiechula 35, J Wikne 22, G Wilk 77, J Wilkinson 94, M C S Williams 104, B Windelband 94, M Winn 94, H Yang 57, P Yang 7, S Yano 47, C Yasar 69, Z Yin 7, H Yokoyama 128, I-K Yoo 96, J H Yoon 50, V Yurchenko 3, I Yushmanov 80, A Zaborowska 133, V Zaccolo 81, A Zaman 16, C Zampolli 36,104, H J C Zanoli 120, S Zaporozhets 66, N Zardoshti 101, A Zarochentsev 131, P Závada 60, N Zaviyalov 99, H Zbroszczyk 133, I S Zgura 62, M Zhalov 86, H Zhang 18, X Zhang 74, Y Zhang 7, C Zhang 57, Z Zhang 7, C Zhao 22, N Zhigareva 58, D Zhou 7, Y Zhou 81, Z Zhou 18, H Zhu 18, J Zhu 7,113, A Zichichi 12,28, A Zimmermann 94, M B Zimmermann 36,54, G Zinovjev 3, M Zyzak 43; ALICE Collaboration139
PMCID: PMC4861205  PMID: 27217821

Abstract

The production of K(892)0 and ϕ(1020) mesons has been measured in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV. K0 and ϕ are reconstructed via their decay into charged hadrons with the ALICE detector in the rapidity range -0.5<y<0. The transverse momentum spectra, measured as a function of the multiplicity, have a pT range from 0 to 15 GeV/c for K0 and from 0.3 to 21 GeV/c for ϕ. Integrated yields, mean transverse momenta and particle ratios are reported and compared with results in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV and Pb–Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV. In Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions, K0 and ϕ probe the hadronic phase of the system and contribute to the study of particle formation mechanisms by comparison with other identified hadrons. For this purpose, the mean transverse momenta and the differential proton-to-ϕ ratio are discussed as a function of the multiplicity of the event. The short-lived K0 is measured to investigate re-scattering effects, believed to be related to the size of the system and to the lifetime of the hadronic phase.

Introduction

The phase transition predicted by QCD from ordinary matter to a deconfined quark–gluon plasma (QGP) has been studied in high-energy heavy-ion collision (AA) experiments at the super proton synchrotron (SPS) [111], the relativistic heavy-ion collider (RHIC) [1215] and the large hadron collider (LHC) [1622]. In this context, hadronic resonances provide an important contribution to the study of particle production mechanisms and the characterisation of the dynamic evolution of the system formed in heavy-ion collisions, during the late hadronic phase. Results on resonance production in different collision systems at RHIC have been reported in [2329]. At the LHC, K(892)0 and ϕ(1020) production have been measured in pp collisions at s=7TeV by ALICE [30], ATLAS [31] and LHCb [32], and in pp and Pb--Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV by ALICE [33, 34]. Results obtained in p--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV with the ALICE detector are presented in this paper.

Measurements in smaller collision systems such as proton–proton (pp) and proton–nucleus (pA) constitute a reference for the interpretation of the heavy-ion results. In addition, proton–nucleus collisions have proven to be interesting in their own right, as several measurements [3539] indicate that they cannot be explained by an incoherent superposition of pp collisions, but suggest instead the presence of collective effects [40, 41]. In heavy-ion collisions, the presence of a strong collective radial flow reveals itself in the evolution with centrality of the transverse momentum spectra of identified hadrons [42]. The spectral shapes of K0 and ϕ follow the common behaviour found for all the other particles and exhibit an increase of the mean transverse momentum, dominated by the low pT region of the spectra where particle production is more abundant, with centrality [33]. In central Pb--Pb events, particles with similar mass such as the ϕ meson and the proton have similar pT and, in addition, the ϕ/p ratio as a function of pT is flat for pT < 4 GeV/c. Both observations are consistent with expectations from hydrodynamic models, where the mass of the particle drives the particle spectral shapes at low momenta [43]. On the other hand, in most peripheral Pb--Pb collisions, as well as in pp, the ϕ/p ratio exhibits a strong pT dependence, suggesting that the production of low- and intermediate-momentum baryons and mesons occurs by means of other mechanisms such as fragmentation or recombination [44, 45].

Similarly to Pb--Pb, one is interested in searching for collective effects in p--Pb collisions and in studying particle production as a function of the hadron multiplicity, which strongly depends on the geometry of the collision. In this respect, p--Pb collisions provide us with a system whose size in terms of average charged-particle density and number of participating nucleons is intermediate between pp and peripheral Pb--Pb collisions [18, 4649]. Measurements in an intermediate-size system as p--Pb can provide information on the onset of the collective behaviour leading to the presence of radial flow.

The ϕ meson, with similar mass to that of the proton and rather long lifetime (τϕ = 46.3 ± 0.4 fm/c [50]) compared to that of the fireball, is an ideal candidate for such study. The yields of short-lived resonances such as the K0 (τK0 = 4.16 ± 0.05 fm/c [50]) instead may be influenced by interactions during the hadronic phase: the re-scattering of the decay products in the fireball may prevent the detection of a fraction of the resonances, whereas pseudo-elastic hadron scattering can regenerate them. The effects of re-scattering and regeneration depend on the scattering cross section, the particle density, the particle lifetime and the timespan between chemical and kinetic freeze-out, namely the lifetime of the hadronic phase. Therefore, the observation of re-scattering effects would imply the presence of an extended hadronic phase. The latter can be studied by comparing particles with different lifetimes, such as the K0 resonance and the ϕ meson, which has a ten times longer lifetime. ALICE has observed [33] that in most central Pb--Pb collisions at the LHC the K0/K ratio is significantly suppressed with respect to peripheral Pb--Pb collisions, pp collisions and the value predicted by a statistical hadronisation model [51]. This is interpreted as a scenario where re-scattering during the hadronic phase, dominating for low-momentum resonances (pT < 2 GeV/c) [52, 53], reduces the measurable yield of K0. No suppression is observed instead for the ten times longer-lived ϕ, since it decays mainly after kinetic freeze-out. Based on these observations, a lower limit of 2 fm/c on the lifetime of the hadronic phase in 0–20 % most central Pb--Pb events could be estimated [33]. The K0 suppression exhibits a monotonic trend with centrality, suggesting a dependence on the volume of the particle source at the kinetic freeze-out. A similar measurement of resonance production as a function of the system size in p--Pb can provide information as regards the lifetime of the hadronic fireball produced in such a smaller system.

The K0 and ϕ mesons are reconstructed using the ALICE detector in p--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV. Their yields, mean transverse momenta and ratios to identified long-lived hadrons in p--Pb collisions are studied as a function of the system size or the multiplicity of the event, and compared with pp and Pb--Pb. The experimental conditions are briefly presented in Sect. 2. Section 3 illustrates the analysis procedure, including event and track selection, signal extraction, efficiency correction and systematic uncertainties. The results are presented in Sect. 4 and in Sect. 5 the conclusions are summarised.

Experimental setup

A complete description of the ALICE detector and its performance during the LHC Run I are reported in [54, 55], respectively.

The analyses presented in this paper have been carried out on a sample of p--Pb collision events at sNN=5.02TeV collected in 2013. The LHC configuration was such that the lead beam, with energy of 1.58 TeV per nucleon, was circulating in the counter-clockwise direction, namely towards the ALICE “A” side (positive rapidity direction), while the 4 TeV proton beam was circulating in the clockwise direction, towards the ALICE muon spectrometer, or “C” side. According to this convention for the sign of the coordinates, the nucleon–nucleon center-of-mass system was moving in the laboratory frame with a rapidity of y NN=-0.465 in the direction of the proton beam. In the following, y lab (ηlab) are used to indicate the (pseudo) rapidity in the laboratory reference frame, whereas y (η) denotes the (pseudo) rapidity in the nucleon–nucleon center-of-mass reference system.

For the results presented in this paper, a low-luminosity data sample has been analysed, consisting of events collected at an hadronic interaction rate of about 10 kHz. The interaction region had a root mean square of 6.3 cm along the beam direction and of about 60 μm in the direction transverse to the beam. The event pile-up rate has been estimated to have negligible effects on the results of this analysis. In particular, pile-up of collisions from different bunch crossings is negligible due to the 200 ns bunch-crossing spacing, larger than the integration time of the zero-degree calorimeter (ZDC), while a small fraction of in-bunch pile-up events is removed by the offline analysis, as described in the next section.

Small acceptance forward detectors (V0, T0, and ZDC) are used for triggering, event characterisation, and multiplicity studies. The trigger is provided by two arrays of 32 scintillator detectors, V0A and V0C, that cover the full azimuthal angle in the pseudo-rapidity regions 2.8 < ηlab < 5.1 (Pb-going direction) and -3.7 < ηlab < -1.7 (p-going direction), respectively. V0 information is also used to classify events in multiplicity classes (see Sect. 2.1). The two quartz Cherenkov detectors T0A (4.6 < ηlab < 4.9) and T0C (-3.3 < ηlab < -3) deliver the time and the longitudinal position of the interaction. The zero-degree calorimeters (ZDC), consisting of two tungsten–quartz neutron and two brass–quartz proton calorimeters placed symmetrically at a distance of 113 m from the interaction point, on both sides, are used to reject background and to count spectator nucleons.

The reconstruction of the primary vertex of the collision and the tracking of particles in the ALICE central barrel is provided by the inner tracking system (ITS) and the time-projection chamber (TPC), in the pseudo-rapidity range |ηlab| < 0.9 and the full azimuthal angle. The ITS is a silicon-based detector, constituted by two innermost pixels layers (SPD), two intermediate drift (SDD) and two outer strip layers (SSD), with radii between 3.9 and 43 cm from the beam axis. The ALICE main tracker, the TPC, is a 90 m3 cylindrical drift chamber filled with Ne-CO2 gas and divided in two parts by a central cathode. The end plates are equipped with multi-wire proportional chambers whose readout cathode pads allow one to sample particle tracks up to 159 points (clusters). In addition to tracking, the TPC allows particle identification via the specific ionisation energy loss dE/dx in the gas.

The time-of-flight (TOF) detector, a large Multigap resistive plate chamber (MRPC) array covering |η|< 0.9 and the full azimuthal angle, allows for particle identification at intermediate momenta and has been exploited together with the TPC for the analysis presented in this paper (see Sect. 3.1).

Event selection

The minimum bias trigger during p--Pb data taking was configured to select hadronic events with high efficiency, by requiring a signal in either V0A or V0C. The resulting sample contains single-diffractive (SD), non-single-diffractive (NSD) and electromagnetic (EM) events. Diffractive interactions are described in Regge theory by the exchange of a colour singlet object with the quantum numbers of the vacuum (pomeron). In SD events one of the two nucleons breaks up producing particles in a limited rapidity interval. NSD events include double-diffractive interactions, where both nucleons break up by producing particles separated by a large rapidity gap, and other inelastic interactions. The offline analysis selects events having a coincidence of signals in both V0A and V0C in order to reduce the contamination from SD and EM events to a negligible amount. The trigger and event-selection efficiency for NSD events is estimated as ϵNSD = 99.2 % using a combination of Monte-Carlo event generators, as described in [48, 49]. The arrival time of signals on the V0 and the ZDC is required to be compatible with a nominal p–Pb collision occurring close to the nominal interaction point, to ensure the rejection of beam-gas and other machine-induced background collisions.

The primary vertex of the collision is determined using tracks reconstructed in the TPC and ITS. In case of low multiplicity events only the information from the SPD is used to reconstruct the vertex, as described in detail in [55]. 98.5 % of all events have a primary vertex. Minimum bias events with the primary vertex positioned along the beam axis within 10 cm from the center of the ALICE detector are selected offline. A small fraction (0.2 %) of pile-up events from the same bunch crossing has been removed from the sample by rejecting events with multiple vertices. Events are accepted if the vertices separately measured by the SPD and using tracks are within 0.5 cm, and if the SPD vertex is determined by at least five track segments defined by one hit in each one of the two layers of the detector.

After the trigger and offline event-selection criteria, the sample used for this analysis counts about 108 events, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of about 50 μb-1. The minimum bias sample has been further divided in several event classes based on the charged-particle multiplicity, estimated using the total charge deposited in the V0A detector positioned along the direction of the Pb beam. The yield of K0 is measured in five multiplicity classes, namely 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80 and 80–100 %. In case of ϕ seven classes, namely 0–5, 5–10, 10–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80 and 80–100 % are used. In addition, minimum bias spectra normalised to the fraction of NSD events are measured for both particles.

In order to study the dependence of particle production on the geometry of the collision, the V0A estimator for the charged particle multiplicity has been used to determine centrality, by following the approach based on the Glauber Monte Carlo model combined with a simple model for particle production [56, 57], a strategy customarily employed in heavy-ion collisions [58]. The average number of binary collisions Ncoll (related to the number of participant nucleons Npart by the simple relation Ncoll = Npart -1), obtained with this method for each centrality class, are listed in Table 1 for future reference, together with the mean charged-particle multiplicity density, dNch/dηlab|η|<0.5 [47, 48], here corrected for trigger and vertex-reconstruction inefficiency, which is about 5.5 % in the lowest multiplicity event class. In addition, the average Ncoll has been determined with an hybrid method that uses the ZDC to classify the events according to the energy deposited by the neutrons emitted in the Pb-going direction (by evaporation or fragmentation) or the energy measured with the ZDC in the Pb-going direction and the assumption that the charged-particle multiplicity measured at mid-rapidity is proportional to the number of participant nucleons. This method was shown [49] to avoid possible bias in the event sample related to the fact that the range of multiplicities used to select a given class in p--Pb collisions is of similar magnitude to the fluctuations on the same quantity. The variations of the average Ncoll for a given multiplicity class, obtained with different methods are found not to exceed 6 % in any of the used classes.

Table 1.

Average charged-particle pseudo-rapidity density, dNch/dηlab|η|<0.5, measured at mid-rapidity in visible cross section event classes and average number of colliding nucleons, Ncoll. Multiplicity classes are defined using the V0A estimator [48, 49], as described in the text. Total systematic uncertainties are reported, see [49] for details, which do not include the difference with respect to the other methods used to estimate the average Ncoll. For minimum bias collisions, dNch/dηlab = 16.81 ± 0.71 and Ncoll = 6.87 ± 0.5

Multiplicity class (%) dNch/dηlab|η|<0.5 Ncoll
0–5 45 ± 1 14.8 ± 1.5
5–10 36.2 ± 0.8 13.0 ± 1.3
10–20 30.5 ± 0.7 11.7 ± 1.2
0–20 35.6 ± 0.8 12.8 ± 1.3
20–40 23.2 ± 0.5 9.36 ± 0.84
40–60 16.1 ± 0.4 6.42 ± 0.46
60–80 9.8 ± 0.2 3.81 ± 0.76
80–100 4.16 ± 0.09 1.94 ± 0.45

Resonance signal reconstruction

K(892)0 and ϕ(1020) mesons are reconstructed through their decay into charged hadrons, K0  K+ π- and K0¯  K- π+, B.R. = 0.666, and ϕ  K+ K-, B.R. = 0.489 [50]. Since K(892)0 and K¯(892)0 are expected to be produced in equal amounts, as measured in lower energy experiments [59], for this measurement the yields of particle and anti-particle are combined in order to improve statistics. The average (K(892)0 + K¯(892)0)/2 is indicated as K0 in the following. The ϕ(1020) meson is indicated as ϕ.

For these measurements, the reconstructed K0 and ϕ are selected in the rapidity range -0.5 < y < 0, in order to ensure the best detector acceptance as the center of mass of the nucleon–nucleon system was moving with respect to the beam interaction point.

Track selection and particle identification

The charged tracks coming from the primary vertex of the collision (“primary” tracks) with pT > 0.15 GeV/c and |ηlab| < 0.8 are considered for the invariant-mass reconstruction of K0 and ϕ in this analysis. The selection of primary tracks imposes the requirement that they satisfy good reconstruction quality criteria. It is required that tracks have left a signal in at least one of the layers of the SPD and that the distance of closest approach to the primary vertex of the collisions is lower than 7σxy in the transverse plane and within 2 cm along the longitudinal direction. The resolution on the distance of closest approach in the transverse plane, σxy, is strongly pT-dependent and lower than 100 μm for pT > 0.5 GeV/c [55]. In addition tracks are required to cross at least 70 out of maximum 159 horizontal segments (or “rows”) along the transverse readout plane of the TPC.

Primary tracks have been identified as π or K based on the information of the TPC and TOF detectors. In the TPC, charged hadrons are identified by measuring the specific ionisation energy loss (dE/dx) in the detector gas. With a resolution (σTPC) on dE/dx of 6 %, the TPC allows a 2σTPC separation between π and K up to pT 0.8 GeV/c and above 3 GeV/c, in the relativistic rise region of the dE/dx. The TOF contributes to particle identification with the measurement of the time-of-flight of the particle, with the start time of the event measured by the T0 detector or using an algorithm which combines the particle arrival times at the TOF surface. In p–Pb collisions, when the event time is determined by the TOF algorithm (available for 100 % of the events which have more than three tracks) the resolution is 80 < σTOF < 100 ps. TOF allows a 2σTOF separation between identified π and K in the momentum range 0.7–3 GeV/c, and between K and protons up to 5 GeV/c [60].

For the combined “TPC-TOF PID” approach, particles with a signal in the TOF are identified by requiring that the measured time-of-flight and energy loss do not deviate from the expected values for each given mass hypothesis by more than 2σTOF and 5σTPC, respectively. For tracks which do not hit the TOF active region, a 2σTPC selection on the dE/dx is applied. Variations of these cuts have been used for systematic studies, as described in Sect. 3.4. Besides the TPC-TOF, the measurement of ϕ has been performed following two alternative strategies, one which exploits a 2σTPC separation on the particle energy loss in the TPC for the K identification, and the second for which no PID cuts are applied. In the no-PID scheme all positively charged hadrons are considered as K+ whereas all negatively charged hadrons are considered as K-. The no-PID approach extends the measurement of the yields from pT = 10 GeV/c, the upper limit reached by the PID analysis, to 16 GeV/c (multiplicity dependent) or 21 GeV/c (minimum bias). At low pT, the TPC-TOF selection leads to a better separation between signal and background with respect to TPC-only and no-PID, therefore it is used until pT(ϕ)cutoff = 3 GeV/c. At high momentum, K and π cannot be efficiently separated by TPC-TOF, therefore no-PID is used for pT(ϕ) > 3 GeV/c to maximise the total reconstruction efficiency. The multiplicity-integrated yields of ϕ (see Sect. 4) obtained with the no-PID, TPC only, and TPC-TOF approaches are compared in Fig. 1a in the common transverse momentum interval. Details of the signal extraction procedure and efficiency correction are given, respectively, in Sects. 3.2 and 3.3. The ratio of the data to the Lévy–Tsallis function (see Sect. 4.1) used to fit the TPC-TOF spectrum in the 0.3 < pT < 10 GeV/c range (Fig. 1b) further shows good agreement among the three analyses, within uncertainties. In the case of K0, which is a wide resonance, PID is necessary also at high momentum to reduce the background and therefore the TPC-TOF strategy has been applied in the full kinematic range.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Comparison of the transverse momentum spectrum d2N/(dpTdy) of ϕ-meson in non-single-diffractive (NSD) p--Pb events, reconstructed via the decay channel into K+ K- by exploiting three different strategies for K identification: TPC only, TPC-TOF and no-PID. The reader can refer to Sect. 3.1 for details on the PID selection and to Sect. 3.2 for a description of the signal extraction procedure. The uncertainties are the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic. A Lévy–Tsallis function (see Eq. 1) is used to fit the TPC-TOF spectrum in 0.3 < pT < 10 GeV/c. b Ratio of each spectrum to the fit function, showing good agreement of the three PID strategies within uncertainties

Signal extraction

K0 and ϕ signals are reconstructed in each multiplicity class and transverse momentum interval, as described in [30, 33]. For each event, the invariant-mass distribution of the K0 (ϕ) is constructed using all unlike-sign combinations of charged K candidates with π (K) candidates. For K0 in the full momentum range and for ϕ up to 3 GeV/c the TPC-TOF approach has been used for particle identification. ϕ mesons with pT > 3 GeV/c have been reconstructed by applying no PID. In the following the K+ and π+ candidates are labelled by h+, the K- and π- are labelled by h-. The combinatorial background due to the uncorrelated pairs has been estimated in two ways, by the mixed-event technique and from the invariant-mass distribution of like-sign pairs from the same event. In the event-mixing method the shape of the uncorrelated background is estimated from the invariant-mass distribution of h+h- combinations from five different events. Effects from multiplicity fluctuations are minimised by dividing the sample into ten multiplicity classes and by performing event mixing within the same multiplicity class. In order to minimise distortions due to acceptance effects within each multiplicity class, the events are further sub-divided into 20 bins according to the relative vertex position along the z-axis (Δzv = 1 cm). The final mixed-event distribution for each multiplicity class is found by adding up the Minv distributions from each vertex Δzv interval. For the K0 analysis, the mixed-event distribution for each pT bin is normalised by the smallest factor that leads to a positive-defined unlike-sign distribution after subtraction, within the statistical error in all invariant-mass bins. The mixed-event distribution for ϕ is normalised in the mass region 1.04 < MKK < 1.06 GeV/c2. The normalisation range for K0 and ϕ is varied for systematic studies. In the like-sign technique, the invariant-mass distribution for the uncorrelated background is obtained by combining the h+h+ and h-h- pairs from the same event according to a geometric mean (2(h+h+)·(h-h-)), in order to reduce statistical fluctuations in the resulting distribution. The like-sign background is subtracted without normalisation from the unlike-sign pairs distribution. The mixed-event method has been preferred for K0 (ϕ) signal extraction in the range 0.4 < pT < 15 GeV/c (0.3 < pT < 16 GeV/c), given the smaller statistical uncertainties on the invariant-mass distribution. At very low momentum, pT < 0.4 GeV/c, the like-sign distribution is found to reproduce better the background of the K0 and not to be affected by the choice of the normalisation range, therefore it has been preferred over the mixed event. Figure 2 shows the MKπ and MKK invariant-mass distributions before and after background subtraction in the transverse momentum interval 1.2  pT < 1.4 GeV/c, for the 0–20 and 0–5 % V0A multiplicity classes, for K0 and ϕ, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Invariant-mass distributions for K0 (a, b) and ϕ (c, d) in the transverse momentum range 1.2  pT < 1.4 GeV/c and multiplicity classes 0–20 and 0–5 %, respectively. Upper panels a, c, report the unlike-sign invariant-mass distribution and the mixed-event background (MEB) normalised as described in the text. In lower panels b, c, the distributions after background subtraction are shown. The K0 peak is fitted with a Breit–Wigner function whereas the ϕ meson peak is described by a Voigtian function. A second-order polynomial function is used to describe the residual background

After background subtraction, the resulting distributions exhibit a characteristic peak on top of a residual background (lower panels of Fig. 2). The latter is only partly due to imperfections in the description of the combinatorial background and mainly due to correlated pairs from jets, multi-body decay of heavier particles or correlated pairs contribution to the background from real resonance decays where the daughter particles are misidentified as K or π by the TPC-TOF PID. A dedicated study in Monte Carlo simulations has been performed to ensure that the shape of the correlated background is a smooth function of mass and to verify that a second-order polynomial provides a good description of it.

As in [30], the signal peaks for K0 and ϕ are fitted, respectively, with a (non-relativistic) Breit–Wigner and a Voigtian function (convolution of Breit–Wigner and Gaussian) superimposed to a second-order polynomial function to shape the residual background. Examples are reported in the lower panels of Fig. 2, where fits are performed in the intervals 0.76 < MKπ < 1.04 GeV/c2 and 1.0 < MKK < 1.05 GeV/c2. The fitting range is optimised for each pT bin across all multiplicity event classes. The mass and width of K0 and ϕ are found to be compatible with the measurements in Pb--Pb collisions [33]. For the measurement of the yields, the width of K0 and ϕ have been fixed to their natural values, Γ(K0) = 47.4 ± 0.6 MeV/c2, Γ(ϕ) = 4.26 ± 0.04 MeV/c2 [50], whereas the resolution parameter of the Voigtian function for ϕ has been kept as a free parameter. The measured pT-dependent resolution on the ϕ mass (sigma of Gaussian) varies between 0.9 and 1.5 MeV/c2, and it is consistent with the values extracted from Monte Carlo simulation. The sensitivity to the choice of the normalisation interval, the fitting range, the shape of the background function, the fitting range and the constraints on mass, width and resolution parameters has been studied by varying the default settings, as described in Sect. 3.4.

In minimum bias collisions the sample of reconstructed particles includes about 3.4×106 K0 and 8.6×105 ϕ in the transverse momentum range 0 < pT(K0) < 15 GeV/c and 0.3 < pT(ϕ) < 21 GeV/c, respectively. With the available statistics, the K0 production in the 80–100% V0A multiplicity event class has been measured up to pT = 6 GeV/c, while the ϕ spectra extend up to 16 GeV/c in the 0–60 % multiplicity percentile interval and up to 13 GeV/c in 60–80 and 80–100 %.

Detector acceptance and efficiency

In order to evaluate the detector acceptance and reconstruction efficiency, a sample of about 108 Monte Carlo simulated p--Pb events, based on the DPMJET 3.05 event generator [61], with the detector geometry and material budget modelled by GEANT 3.21 [62], has been analysed. The acceptance and efficiency correction is determined as the fraction of generated resonances in the rapidity interval -0.5 < y < 0 that have been reconstructed. The reconstructed signal pairs are obtained upon combination of primary π and K selected by applying the same kinematics cuts and track cuts as in the data (see Sect. 3.1), including TPC-TOF PID cuts for K0, and ϕ with pT < 3 GeV/c. For ϕ with pT > 3 GeV/c no PID cuts are applied. The acceptance and efficiency corrections, Acc×ϵ, for K0 and ϕ are reported in Fig. 3 as a function of pT for minimum bias events. Since only events with reconstructed primary vertex have been considered in the computation of (Acc×ϵ)(pT), a correction factor has to be applied to the total number of accepted events in each V0A multiplicity event class, to account for vertex reconstruction inefficiency. The correction is about 0.995 for 60–80 % class and 0.945 for the lowest multiplicity events 80–100 %, and it is applied as discussed in Sect. 4.1.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Detector acceptance and signal reconstruction efficiency for K0 and ϕ mesons, which includes reconstruction, track selection and particle identification efficiency. For K0 and ϕ production below pT < 3 GeV/c, the PID efficiency is relative to the TPC-TOF approach, whereas for ϕ production with pT > 3 GeV/c no PID contribution is included, as no particle identification is applied in the analysis

Systematic uncertainties

The measurement of K0 and ϕ production in p--Pb collisions have been tested for systematic effects due to global tracking efficiency, track selection cuts, PID, signal extraction, knowledge of the material budget and of the hadronic interaction cross section in the detector material, as summarised in Table 2. The approach is similar to the one adopted for the study of K0 and ϕ in Pb--Pb collisions [33], but the total average uncertainty evaluated in the p--Pb case is significantly lower (about half of the relative uncertainty in the Pb--Pb), mainly due to lower contributions from global tracking efficiency and the signal extraction procedure. No multiplicity dependence of systematic effects has been observed, therefore the uncertainties presented in Sect. 2 have been averaged among all multiplicity event classes. For each particle, they are quoted for two separate momentum intervals: for K0, one can distinguish a low-pT range (0 < pT(K0) < 4 GeV/c) where the knowledge of the material budget and hadronic interaction cross section in the detector material enter in the systematic uncertainty, as opposite to the high-pT range (4 < pT(K0) < 15 GeV/c) where these contributions are negligible (<0.5 %). In the ϕ case, two pT intervals are considered, according to the particle identification approach used to identify the decay products, namely the “TPC-TOF” and “No PID” strategies described in Sect. 3.1. The pT region where the TPC-TOF PID is applied (pT < 3 GeV/c), coincides also with the range where effects of material budget and hadronic interaction cross section are relevant for the measurement of ϕ production.

Table 2.

Sources of systematic uncertainties for K0 and ϕ yields (d2N/(dpTdy)). For each source and transverse momentum range (see text for details), the average relative uncertainty over all multiplicity classes is listed. For each pT range, the particle identification (“PID technique”) used for the analysis is also indicated. The contributions have been summed in quadrature to estimate the total relative systematic uncertainty

K0 ϕ
pT (GeV/c) 0–4.0 4.0–15.0 0.3–3.0 3.0–21.0
PID technique TPC-TOF TPC-TOF No PID
Global tracking efficiency 6% 6%
Track selection cuts 2.5% 1.9% 2.2%
Material budget 1.2% <0.5% 2.2% <0.5%
Hadronic interaction cross section 1.9% <0.5% 2.4% <1%
Particle identification 1.1% 2.7% 0.9%
Signal extraction 3.8% 4.6% 1.8% 4.3%
Total 7.9% 8.4% 7.4% 7.7%

The main source of uncertainty, common to K0 and ϕ, comes from the determination of the global tracking efficiency. In p--Pb collisions this contribution has been estimated to be a pT-independent effect of 3 % for charged particles [48], which results in a 6 % effect when any two tracks are combined in the invariant-mass analysis of K0 and ϕ.

The track selection was varied to study systematic effects: the analyses are sensitive to variations of the cuts on the number of crossed rows in the TPC and the distance of closest approach to the primary vertex of the collision. Track selection enters in the total uncertainty with a relative contribution of 2.5 % for K0 and about 1.9–2.2 % for the ϕ case.

At high transverse momentum, namely for pT(K0) > 8 GeV/c and pT(ϕ) > 12 GeV/c, the systematic uncertainties are dominated by the raw yield extraction procedure. This contribution is labelled as “Signal extraction” in Table 2 and it includes the background normalisation region, the choice of the fitting range, the residual background shape and variations of the constraints on the fit parameters. In addition to the default strategy described in Sect. 3.2, the mixed-event background distributions for K0 and ϕ have been normalised in different invariant-mass regions that surround, but exclude the signal peaks. The sensitivity of the K0 (ϕ) yield extraction to the fit range has been studied by varying each interval boundary within ±50 MeV/c2(±5 MeV/c2). As alternative to the second-order polynomial, third- and first-order polynomial functions have been used to fit the residual background. The measurements for both K0 and ϕ turned out to be independent on the mass parameters, but not on the constraints on the K0 width and ϕ mass resolution. Therefore, the K0 width has been varied by ±50 % for systematic studies, while the ϕ resolution has been varied within the range of values observed in the simulation. Due to the lower particle multiplicity and the improved PID strategy that has led to a lower residual background after mixed-event background subtraction, the contribution of signal extraction for K0 is reduced by half in p--Pb with respect to the Pb--Pb case, where the uncertainty associated to the choice of the fitting range was larger than 9 % [33].

In order to study the effect of the PID selection on signal extraction, the cuts on TOF and TPC have been varied to 3σ and 4σ with respect to the default settings described in Sect. 3.1, resulting in the average contribution to the systematic uncertainty reported in Table 2 as “particle identification”. For K0 the average contribution from PID is 1.1% in the low-pT range, and 2.7 % at high transverse momenta. The contribution to the ϕ uncertainty is 0.9 % on average in the transverse momentum range where TPC-TOF PID is applied.

The knowledge of the material budget contributes for K0 (ϕ) with an average of 1.2 % (2.2 %) at low transverse momentum, and a maximum of 3.5 % (5.4 %), reached for 0 < pT < 0.2 GeV/c (0.8 < pT < 0.9 GeV/c). In both cases, it is negligible for pT > 3 GeV/c. The contribution from the estimate of the hadronic interaction cross section in the detector material is 1.9 % (2.4%) for K0 (ϕ) at low pT, negligible for pT > 4 GeV/c (pT > 3 GeV/c). These effects were evaluated by combining the uncertainties for a π and a K (for K0), and for two K (in the case of ϕ), determined as in [42, 47], according to the kinematics of the decay.

The systematics were studied independently for all event classes, in order to separate the sources which are multiplicity-dependent and uncorrelated across multiplicity bins. In particular, signal extraction and PID are fully uncorrelated sources, whereas global tracking, track cuts, material budget and hadronic cross section are correlated among different event classes.

Results and discussion

Transverse momentum spectra

The multiplicity-dependent transverse momentum spectra of K0 and ϕ mesons measured in the rapidity range -0.5 < y < 0 are reported in Fig. 4. Measured yields are corrected for acceptance, efficiency and branching ratio, and normalised to the visible cross section in each V0A multiplicity event class, as discussed in Sect. 3.3. The minimum bias spectra for K0 and ϕ are also reported in Fig. 4 and have been normalised to the number of NSD events after applying the correction for trigger efficiency and event selection (ϵNSD), vertex reconstruction (ϵvtx) and vertex selection described in Sect. 2, resulting in a total scaling factor of 0.964.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Transverse momentum spectra d2N/(dpTdy) of K0 (a) and ϕ (b) for different multiplicity classes (V0A estimator), measured in the rapidity range -0.5 < y < 0. K0 and K0¯ are averaged. The multiplicity-dependent spectra are normalised to the visible cross section, whereas the minimum bias spectrum is normalised to the fraction of NSD events (see text). Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are indicated. Dashed lines represent Lévy–Tsallis fits; see text for details

The pT-integrated particle yields, dN/dy, and mean transverse momentum, pT, are determined by using the transverse momentum spectra in the measured range and by using a fit function to extrapolate the yield in the pT range where no measurement is available. The same procedure is applied to the spectra of K0 and ϕ for each event class. The Lévy–Tsallis parameterisation [63] has been chosen to fit the corrected d2N/(dpTdy) spectra, as it has successfully been adopted to fit the particle spectra in pp collisions at RHIC and at LHC [30, 6466]. The Lévy–Tsallis functional form describes the shape of the exponential spectra at low transverse momentum and the power law distributions at large pT with an inverse slope parameter C and an exponent parameter n

d2NdpTdy=pTdNdy(n-1)(n-2)nC[nC+m0(n-2)]×1+pT2+m02-m0nC-n, 1

where m0 is the mass of the particle, n, C and the integrated yields dN/dy are the free parameters. The fits are performed in the pT range where the Lévy–Tsallis function provides a satisfactory description of each spectrum, namely in the interval 0–10 GeV/c for K0 and 0.3–10.0 GeV/c for ϕ. The values of the fit parameters C and n, as well as the reduced χ2 are reported in Table 3, together with the dN/dy and pT obtained using the data and the fit function in the extrapolation region.

Table 3.

Parameters of the Lévy–Tsallis fit function and values of ϕ and K0 dN/dy and pT for different multiplicity classes. The C and n parameters with their statistical uncertainty, the reduced χ2 of the fit and the fraction of the total yield obtained by extrapolation (“Extr.”) are reported. The yields and pT are obtained considering data in the measured range and using the result of the fit in the extrapolation region, and are listed as (value ± stat. ± uncorr. ± corr.), where the errors are the statistical uncertainty, the uncorrelated and correlated contributions to the systematic uncertainty, respectively. In the pT case, the contribution to the systematic uncertainty correlated across multiplicity classes is negligible. The minimum bias spectrum has been normalised to the fraction of non-single-diffractive events (NSD) and an additional 3.1 % relative contribution from the normalisation to NSD has to be considered in the systematic uncertainty on dN/dy

Multiplicity (%) C (GeV) n χ2/ndf Extr. dN/dy (data + extr.) pT (GeV/c)
K0
   0–20 0.440 ± 0.010 11.1 ± 0.5 1.7 <10-4 0.616 ± 0.008 ± 0.037 ± 0.037 1.379 ± 0.011 ± 0.020
   20–40 0.430 ± 0.009 9.7 ± 0.4 1.7 <10-4 0.426 ± 0.006 ± 0.026 ± 0.026 1.300 ± 0.010 ± 0.019
   40–60 0.359 ± 0.008 8.8 ± 0.3 0.5 <10-4 0.302 ± 0.004 ± 0.019 ± 0.018 1.211 ± 0.009 ± 0.017
   60–80 0.309 ± 0.008 7.8 ± 0.3 0.6 <10-4 0.185 ± 0.003 ± 0.013 ± 0.011 1.108 ± 0.009 ± 0.021
   80–100 0.224 ± 0.008 6.2 ± 0.3 0.4 0.002 0.083 ± 0.001 ± 0.005 ± 0.005 0.943 ± 0.009 ± 0.016
   NSD 0.388 ± 0.003 9.4 ± 0.1 1.8 <10-4 0.315 ± 0.002 ± 0.018 ± 0.018 1.270 ± 0.005 ± 0.017
ϕ
   0–5 0.472 ± 0.010 12.5 ± 0.9 1.5 0.094 0.377 ± 0.004 ± 0.020 ± 0.023 1.437 ± 0.009 ± 0.028
   5–10 0.469 ± 0.010 12.0 ± 0.8 1.1 0.094 0.288 ± 0.003 ± 0.014 ± 0.017 1.442 ± 0.009 ± 0.025
   10–20 0.453 ± 0.010 11.3 ± 0.6 1.2 0.097 0.244 ± 0.002 ± 0.012 ± 0.014 1.421 ± 0.008 ± 0.024
   20–40 0.413 ± 0.009 9.8 ± 0.4 1.1 0.105 0.185 ± 0.001 ± 0.009 ± 0.011 1.357 ± 0.006 ± 0.025
   40–60 0.382 ± 0.009 8.8 ± 0.4 0.6 0.115 0.1229 ± 0.0008 ± 0.0064 ± 0.0073 1.310 ± 0.006 ± 0.031
   60–80 0.349 ± 0.009 8.3 ± 0.4 0.5 0.115 0.0695 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0037 ± 0.0041 1.242 ± 0.008 ± 0.024
   80–100 0.260 ± 0.010 6.7 ± 0.3 0.4 0.163 0.0297 ± 0.0004 ± 0.0023 ± 0.0018 1.055 ± 0.010 ± 0.030
   NSD 0.412 ± 0.014 10.0 ± 0.5 0.8 0.106 0.1344 ± 0.0005 ± 0.0069 ± 0.0081 1.355 ± 0.003 ± 0.030

For K0 the extrapolation, necessary only at high pT, covers a fraction of the total yield lower than 0.1 %. For ϕ the extrapolated yield is dominated by the fraction of signal in the low transverse momentum region, which constitutes about 10.6 % of the total in the minimum bias case. For all multiplicity classes this fraction is reported in Table 3. It can be noticed that the inverse slope parameter C and the exponent parameter n increase with multiplicity, reflecting the flattening of the spectra from peripheral to most central events.

The uncertainty on dN/dy and pT is dominated by systematics, which include the contribution of the pT-uncorrelated systematic uncertainty on the measured spectrum (in average about 6.3 % for K0, 3.6 % for ϕ), the pT-correlated contributions from global tracking efficiency (6 % for K0 and ϕ, only on dN/dy), and the extrapolation of the yield. The first contribution has been estimated by repeating the Lévy–Tsallis fits moving the measured points within their systematic uncertainties, whereas in order to evaluate the latter, a blast-wave function [67] has been used alternatively to fit the spectra. The relative systematic uncertainty on dN/dy due to the choice of the fit function varies between 1.5 and 3 % for ϕ, going from high to low multiplicity. Such a contribution is negligible in the case of K0, due to the fact that its production is measured down to zero transverse momentum.

Mean transverse momentum

In a hydrodynamically evolving system the spectral shapes are driven by the expansion velocity, thus by the mass of the particle and they are expected to follow “mass ordering”. Vice versa, the observation of mass ordering of particle spectra may be suggestive of the presence of collective (hydrodynamic) behaviour of the system. Although the presence of a strong radial flow is established in Pb--Pb collisions [42], the measurements in p--Pb are not conclusive [47], as the comparison between data and models for pp collisions that incorporate final-state effects (such as colour reconnection), shows that the latter could mimic the presence of radial flow. The measurements of K0 and ϕ can further probe the presence of “mass ordering”, since they have a similar mass to the proton.

The transverse momentum spectra of K0 and ϕ, reported in Fig. 4, become flatter, thus harder, going from the most peripheral to the most central p--Pb events. In other words, the mean transverse momentum increases with multiplicity. This is also shown in Fig. 5, where the pT of K0 and ϕ as a function of the average charged-particle multiplicity density (dNch/dηlab|η|<0.5) is compared to that of other identified hadrons, including π ±, K±, KS0, p, Λ, Ξ- and Ω-, in p--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV [47, 68]. Going from the lowest to the highest multiplicity events, the relative increase of pT for K0 and ϕ mesons is about 40 %, common to a wide variety of particles, including K±, KS0, Λ, Ξ± and Ω±. The relative increase is smaller for π (about 26 %) but larger for protons (about 52 %). The pT of K0 is about 10 % larger than that of proton in all event classes and compatible with pT of Λ. The pT of ϕ is instead about 20 % larger than proton and between 4 % (0–5 %) and 8 % (80–100 %) larger than Λ. A similar hierarchy is also observed in pp collisions and peripheral Pb--Pb collisions, but not in central Pb--Pb collisions, where, as expected from hydrodynamics, particles with similar mass have similar pT.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Mean transverse momentum of K0 and ϕ compared to that of identified π ±, K±, KS0, p, Λ, Ξ- and Ω- previously measured by ALICE in p--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV [47, 68] as a function of the charged-particle density measured in the pseudo-rapidity range |ηlab| < 0.5 (dNch/dηlab|η|<0.5). The KS0, Λ and Ξ- points are slightly displaced along the x-axis to avoid superposition with other points. Statistical uncertainties are represented as bars, whereas boxes indicate systematic uncertainties

In Fig. 6 the pT of K0, proton and ϕ are compared in the three collision systems as a function of the cubic root of the average charged-particle multiplicity density, dNch/dηlab1/3. Based on the observation that the femtoscopic radii scale approximately linearly with dNch/dηlab1/3 [20], this observable is used as a proxy for the system size, associated with the radius of the fireball at freeze-out. In p--Pb, where no extended hadronic medium is expected to be formed, the system size can be associated to the width of the distribution of the particle emission points. The argument holding for Pb--Pb has been extended in this paper also to the proton–nucleus case, based on the linear trend of the measured radii with dNch/dηlab1/3 in p--Pb collisions [69]. From Fig. 6 one can see that at similar event multiplicity, the pT is larger in p--Pb than in Pb--Pb and the increase with multiplicity is steeper. An analogous observation for unidentified charged particles has been reported in [70], where it is shown that in models of pp collisions, the strong increase in pT with Nch can be understood as the effect of colour reconnection between strings produced in multi-parton interactions. Considering that for a given multiplicity class in p--Pb and peripheral Pb--Pb events the geometry of the collision and the dynamics of the systems are different but the production of K0 and ϕ mesons relative to long-lived hadrons is comparable (see Sect. 4.4), one can conclude that the sample of p--Pb collisions is dominated by events with a larger fraction of quadri-momentum transferred, thus “harder”.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

System size dependence of the mean transverse momentum of K0 compared to that of the proton (left panel) and pT of ϕ compared to that of the proton (right panel). The system size is defined as the cubic root of the average charged particle multiplicity density (dNch/dηlab1/3) measured in the ALICE central barrel (|ηlab| < 0.5) in pp at s  = 7 TeV (green) [30, 64], p--Pb at sNN  = 5.02 TeV (blue) [47, 68] and Pb--Pb at sNN=2.76TeV (red) [33, 42]. Statistical uncertainties are represented as bars, boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties

In central Pb--Pb collisions, pT of K0, proton and ϕ are consistent within uncertainties (Fig. 6) and follow “mass ordering”. This is consistent with the hypothesis that particle boost in the hadronic phase is driven by radial flow [33, 42]. This mass ordering seems to weaken going towards peripheral Pb--Pb collisions, where it is only approximate. In p--Pb and minimum bias pp collisions pT(ϕ) > pT(K0) > pT(p).

The pT for several particles as a function of their mass for 0–20 % p--Pb at sNN=5.02TeV and minimum bias pp collisions at s=7TeV [30, 64, 66] are illustrated in Fig. 7. In p--Pb, the pT of all particles but K0 has been obtained as the average between the available measured values weighted by the particle integrated yields in 0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 % [47, 68]. For K0, the direct measurement of pT in 0–20 % is available (see Table 3). For the pp case, also the recent measurements on the short-lived baryonic resonances Σ(1385)± and Ξ(1530)0 (indicated as Σ± and Ξ0) have been included in the comparison. The mean transverse momentum is larger for larger masses, but Fig. 7 shows that in pp and p--Pb collisions the pT values for K0 and ϕ mesons are systematically larger with respect to a linear trend which includes protons and Λ instead. These results seem to suggest that a different type of scaling holds in pp and p--Pb collisions and prepare the way for a more detailed investigation, which is, however, outside of the scope of this paper.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Mass dependence of the mean transverse momentum of identified particles measured by ALICE in minimum bias pp collisions at s=7TeV [30, 64, 66] and 0–20 % p--Pb collisions [47, 68]. Statistical uncertainties are represented as bars, boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties

Differential (p+p¯)/ϕ ratio

The multiplicity dependence of the (p+¯}p)/ϕ ratio as a function of transverse momentum is studied to compare the spectral shapes of ϕ mesons and protons [47]. The differential ratios for the 0–5 and 80–100 % V0A multiplicity event classes in p--Pb collisions are reported in Fig. 8 together with the ratios in minimum bias pp collisions, 0–10 % central and 60–80 % peripheral Pb--Pb. In peripheral p--Pb the (p+p¯)/ϕ ratio exhibits a qualitatively similar steep decrease as in pp collisions, and it is consistent with the ratio measured in 80–90 % peripheral Pb--Pb collisions ([33], not shown in Fig. 8). The flat behaviour of (p+p¯)/ϕ for pT < 3 GeV/c in 0–10 % central Pb--Pb collisions has been previously discussed in [33] and found to be consistent with the expectations of hydrodynamic models. In the 0–5 % p--Pb, a hint of flattening is observed for pT < 1.5 GeV/c, but systematic uncertainties are such that no conclusive evidence can be derived. Despite being about 10–20 % larger but compatible within uncertainties, the best qualitative agreement of (p+p¯)/ϕ in high-multiplicity p--Pb (0–5 % V0A multiplicity event class) is achieved with respect to the 60–80 % peripheral Pb--Pb collisions, which has also a similar particle multiplicity.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The (p+p¯)/ϕ ratio measured in p--Pb in 0–5 and 80–100 % V0A multiplicity classes, compared to the same ratio measured in minimum bias pp collision at s=7TeV [30, 64], 0–10 % central and 60–80 % peripheral Pb--Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV [33]

Integrated particle ratios

Particle ratios are useful observables to study particle production mechanisms by comparing particles with similar or different strangeness content, mass and lifetime. Short-lived particles such as K0 and ϕ are used in heavy-ion collisions to derive information on the lifetime of the hadronic phase and on the mechanisms which take place before the kinetic freeze-out, such as re-scattering and regeneration. If dominant over regeneration, re-scattering is expected to reduce the observed yield of resonances, especially at low momentum and in high particle density environments [52]. For the K0 resonance re-scattering is the dominant effect at play in most central Pb--Pb collisions (and at low transverse momentum, pT < 2 GeV/c). This observation comes from the strong centrality dependence of the K0/K ratio (see Fig. 9) and its direct comparison with the ratio of the longer-lived ϕ meson relative to K [33].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Ratio of K0 and ϕ to charged K measured in the three collision systems, as a function of the cube root of the average charged-particle density (dNch/dηlab1/3) measured at mid-rapidity, used as a proxy for the system size. Squares represent K0/K, circles refer to ϕ/K. Statistical uncertainties (bars) are shown together with total (hollow boxes) and multiplicity-uncorrelated (shaded boxes) systematic uncertainties. Measurements in pp at s=7TeV and Pb--Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV are taken from [30] and [33], respectively

For p--Pb collisions, the ratios of K0 and ϕ-meson production to that of long-lived hadrons have been computed starting from the integrated yields of π, K and proton measured by ALICE with the same data sample [47], and they are reported for each multiplicity class in Table 4.

Table 4.

Ratio of K0 resonance and ϕ-meson yields to long-lived hadrons [47], for different multiplicity classes in p--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV. The results are reported as value ± stat. ± sys. (uncorr.), where the first error is the statistical uncertainty, the second is the total systematic uncertainty and the value in parentheses indicates the component of uncertainty uncorrelated across multiplicity classes

Multiplicity (%) (K0+K0¯)/(π++π-) (K0+K0¯)/(K++K-) (K0+K0¯)/(p+¯}p)
K0
   0–20 0.0379 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0028 (0.0026) 0.270 ± 0.004 ± 0.027 (0.026) 0.676 ± 0.009 ± 0.062 (0.059)
   20–40 0.0392 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0029 (0.0027) 0.289 ± 0.004 ± 0.027 (0.026) 0.698 ± 0.009 ± 0.063 (0.060)
   40–60 0.0395 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0030 (0.0028) 0.298 ± 0.004 ± 0.028 (0.026) 0.700 ± 0.009 ± 0.064 (0.060)
   60–80 0.0393 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0032 (0.0029) 0.308 ± 0.004 ± 0.028 (0.026) 0.696 ± 0.009 ± 0.065 (0.061)
   80–100 0.0399 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0030 (0.0028) 0.325 ± 0.005 ± 0.028 (0.026) 0.745 ± 0.011 ± 0.067 (0.063)
Multiplicity (%) 2ϕ/(π++π-) 2ϕ/(K++K-) 2ϕ/(p+¯}p)
ϕ
   0–5 0.0185 ± 0.0002 ± 0.0014 (0.0009) 0.1290 ± 0.0013 ± 0.0126 (0.0076) 0.331 ± 0.003 ± 0.030 (0.016)
   5–10 0.0174 ± 0.0002 ± 0.0013 (0.0006) 0.1241 ± 0.0013 ± 0.0112 (0.0057) 0.311 ± 0.003 ± 0.028 (0.012)
   10–20 0.0174 ± 0.0001 ± 0.0012 (0.0006) 0.1254 ± 0.0010 ± 0.0110 (0.0053) 0.310 ± 0.003 ± 0.027 (0.011)
   20–40 0.0170 ± 0.0001 ± 0.0012 (0.0006) 0.1250 ± 0.0008 ± 0.0107 (0.0053) 0.303 ± 0.002 ± 0.026 (0.011)
   40–60 0.0161 ± 0.0001 ± 0.0012 (0.0006) 0.1213 ± 0.0009 ± 0.0102 (0.0052) 0.286 ± 0.002 ± 0.025 (0.011)
   60–80 0.0147 ± 0.0001 ± 0.0011 (0.0006) 0.1143 ± 0.0012 ± 0.0089 (0.0046) 0.261 ± 0.003 ± 0.022 (0.010)
   80–100 0.0143 ± 0.0002 ± 0.0013 (0.0009) 0.1160 ± 0.0018 ± 0.0110 (0.0078) 0.267 ± 0.004 ± 0.028 (0.018)

The systematic uncertainty on tracking, track selection, material budget and hadronic interaction cross section are correlated among each particle and its decay products, thus they partially cancel out in the propagation of the error to the final ratio. The residual uncertainties after cancellation are correlated across the event classes. Systematic uncertainties derived from signal extraction and PID selection are uncorrelated.

Based on the results reported in Table 4, one can conclude that no significant multiplicity dependence is observed in the K0/π and the K0/p ratios. The 2ϕ/(π++π-) ratio exhibits instead an increasing trend with multiplicity, going from 0.0143 ± 0.001 in the lowest multiplicity bin to 0.0185 ± 0.001 in the highest multiplicity class, for a total increase of 29 % with a 2.6σ significance. A similar trend with multiplicity is also observed for the 2ϕ/(p+¯}p) ratio, which increases by about 24 % with a significance of 1.3σ going from 80–100 to 0–5 %.

The increase of the 2ϕ/(π++π-) ratio with multiplicity can be interpreted in the context of strangeness enhancement. The enhancement of ϕ-meson (ss¯) production relative to pion has been observed in Pb--Pb to follow the enhancement observed for other strange and multi-strange baryons [33]. In p--Pb the results are in general agreement with the results on Ξ/π and Ω/π ratio [68], which seem to indicate that the strangeness content may control the rate of increase with multiplicity.

Most interesting are the ratios of K0 and ϕ to charged K, which have been compared to similar measurements in pp at s=7TeV [30] and Pb--Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV [33], looking for indications of the presence of re-scattering effects in central p--Pb collisions. K0/K and ϕ/K in the three collision systems are reported in Fig. 9 as a function of dNch/dηlab1/3. While spanning a smaller range of particle multiplicities, the K0/K and ϕ/K ratios in p--Pb cover within uncertainties the range of values measured in peripheral (40–60 and 60–80 %) Pb--Pb and pp collisions.

In order to quantify the evolution of the p--Pb ratios with multiplicity class, the ratios (y) have been fitted with a first-order polynomial, y=ax+b, where x = dNch/dηlab1/3. Only the statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature, have been considered for the purpose of the fit. In p--Pb collisions the ϕ/K ratio follows the trend from minimum bias pp to peripheral Pb--Pb collisions. The linear fit to the p--Pb data returns a positive but small slope parameter, aϕ = 0.008 ± 0.004. A similar fit to the K0/K ratio in p--Pb instead results in a negative slope, aK0=-0.030±0.018. The pp value for the K0/K ratio is consistent with the ratio in the lowest multiplicity p--Pb events. The slope obtained fitting the Pb--Pb data, a’K0=-0.016±0.006, is interpreted as due to re-scattering effects in central collisions [33]. The slopes in Pb--Pb and p--Pb are compatible within the uncertainties (about 60 % in p--Pb and 27 % for Pb--Pb), and the decreasing trend in K0/K may be a hint of the presence of re-scattering effects in high-multiplicity p--Pb events and indicative for a finite lifetime of the hadronic phase in p--Pb collisions. Further comparisons with models of p--Pb collisions which include resonances and re-scattering effects would be useful to distinguish between the different scenarios.

Conclusions

The production of K0 resonances and ϕ mesons in p--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV has been measured with the ALICE detector, including multiplicity-dependent transverse momentum spectra, mean transverse momentum and particle ratios to long-lived light-flavoured hadron production. The system size dependence of these observables has been studied by comparing the p--Pb results with previous measurements in Pb--Pb and pp collisions. In all collision systems, the mean transverse momentum increases with multiplicity for all particle species. The mass ordering observed in central Pb--Pb collisions, where particle with similar mass have similar pT, can be attributed to the presence of radial flow. In p--Pb as well as in pp collisions pT mass ordering is not observed. The measurement of pT for other hadronic species could shed more light on whether the observed effect is due to the mesonic (baryonic) nature of the particles, or instead, this behaviour is common to resonances rather than long-lived hadrons. Ratios of K0 and ϕ production to charged K are found to be in agreement with the ratios measured at similar multiplicities in pp and Pb--Pb collisions. The measurements in p--Pb follow the trend observed in Pb--Pb within the accessible multiplicity range and the uncertainties. The K0/K ratio exhibits a finite negative slope from the lowest to the highest multiplicity p--Pb events, suggestive of a finite lifetime of the hadronic phase in the small p--Pb system.

Acknowledgments

The ALICE Collaboration would like to thank all its engineers and technicians for their invaluable contributions to the construction of the experiment and the CERN accelerator teams for the outstanding performance of the LHC complex. The ALICE Collaboration gratefully acknowledges the resources and support provided by all Grid centres and the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) Collaboration. The ALICE Collaboration acknowledges the following funding agencies for their support in building and running the ALICE detector: State Committee of Science, World Federation of Scientists (WFS) and Swiss Fonds Kidagan, Armenia; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the Chinese Ministry of Education (CMOE) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MSTC); Ministry of Education and Youth of the Czech Republic; Danish Natural Science Research Council, the Carlsberg Foundation and the Danish National Research Foundation; The European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme; Helsinki Institute of Physics and the Academy of Finland; French CNRS-IN2P3, the ‘Region Pays de Loire’, ‘Region Alsace’, ‘Region Auvergne’ and CEA, France; German Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF) and the Helmholtz Association; General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Development, Greece; National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH), Hungary; Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Science and Technology of the Government of India; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) and Centro Fermi-Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche “Enrico Fermi”, Italy; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI and MEXT, Japan; Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF); Consejo Nacional de Cienca y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico(DGAPA), México, Amerique Latine Formation academique-European Commission (ALFA-EC) and the EPLANET Program (European Particle Physics Latin American Network); Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM) and the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Netherlands; Research Council of Norway (NFR); National Science Centre, Poland; Ministry of National Education/Institute for Atomic Physics and National Council of Scientific Research in Higher Education (CNCSI-UEFISCDI), Romania; Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federal Agency of Atomic Energy, Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovations and The Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Ministry of Education of Slovakia; Department of Science and Technology, South Africa; Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT), E-Infrastructure shared between Europe and Latin America (EELA), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain, Xunta de Galicia (Consellería de Educación), Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnolgicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN), Cubaenergía, Cuba, and IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency); Swedish Research Council (VR) and Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW); Ukraine Ministry of Education and Science; United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC); The United States Department of Energy, the United States National Science Foundation, the State of Texas, and the State of Ohio; Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of Croatia and Unity through Knowledge Fund, Croatia; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Footnotes

See Acknowledgments section for the list of collaboration members.

References

  • 1.NA49 Collaboration S. V. Afanasev et al., Production of ϕ mesons in p + p, p + Pb and central Pb + Pb collisions at E(beam) = 158A GeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2000;491:59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01023-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.NA49 Collaboration, C. Alt et al., Energy dependence of ϕ meson production in central Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 6 to 17 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 78, 044907 (2008). arXiv:0806.1937 [nucl-ex]
  • 3.NA50 Collaboration M. C. Abreu et al., Evidence for deconfinement of quarks and gluons from the J/ψ suppression pattern measured in Pb + Pb collisions at the CERN SPS. Phys. Lett. B. 2000;477:28–36. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00237-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.NA50 Collaboration, B. Alessandro et al., A New measurement of J/ψ suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at 158 GeV per nucleon. Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 335–345 (2005). arXiv:hep-ex/0412036 [hep-ex]
  • 5.NA57 Collaboration, F. Antinori et al., Strangeness enhancements at central rapidity in 40 A GeV/c Pb-Pb collisions. J. Phys. G 37, 045105 (2010). arXiv:1001.1884 [nucl-ex]
  • 6.NA60 Collaboration, R. Arnaldi et al., First measurement of the ρ spectral function in high-energy nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162302 (2006). arXiv:nucl-ex/0605007 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.NA60 Collaboration, R. Arnaldi et al., Evidence for radial flow of thermal dileptons in high-energy nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 022302 (2008). arXiv:0711.1816 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.NA60 Collaboration, R. Arnaldi et al., A Comparative measurement of ϕK+K- and ϕμ+μ- in in-in collisions at the CERN SPS. Phys. Lett. B 699, 325–329 (2011). arXiv:1104.4060 [nucl-ex]
  • 9.NA60 Collaboration, K. Banicz et al., ϕ production in in-in collisions at 158A GeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 1–18 (2009). arXiv:0906.1102 [hep-ex]
  • 10.WA97 Collaboration E. Andersen et al., Strangeness enhancement at mid-rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at 158A GeV. Phys. Lett. B. 1999;449:401–406. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00140-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WA97 Collaboration F. Antinori et al., Transverse mass spectra of strange and multistrange particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 158A GeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2000;14:633–641. doi: 10.1007/s100520000386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.PHOBOS Collaboration, B.B. Back et al., The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC. Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28–101 (2005). arXiv:nucl-ex/0410022 [nucl-ex]
  • 13.STAR Collaboration, J. Adams et al., Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: the STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions. Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102–183 (2005). arXiv:nucl-ex/0501009 [nucl-ex]
  • 14.PHENIX Collaboration, K. Adcox et al., Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration. Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184–283 (2005). arXiv:nucl-ex/0410003 [nucl-ex]
  • 15.BRAHMS Collaboration, I. Arsene et al., Quark gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The Perspective from the BRAHMS experiment. Nucl. Phys. A 757, 1–27 (2005). arXiv:nucl-ex/0410020 [nucl-ex]
  • 16.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Elliptic flow of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252302 (2010). arXiv:1011.3914 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Charged-particle multiplicity density at mid-rapidity in central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252301 (2010). arXiv:1011.3916 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Centrality dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity density at mid-rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 032301 (2011). arXiv:1012.1657 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Suppression of charged particle production at large transverse momentum in central Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 696, 30–39 (2011). arXiv:1012.1004 [nucl-ex]
  • 20.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations in central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 696, 328–337 (2011). arXiv:1012.4035 [nucl-ex]
  • 21.ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a centrality-dependent dijet asymmetry in lead-lead collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303 (2010). arXiv:1011.6182 [hep-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation and studies of jet quenching in PbPb collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 84, 024906 (2011). arXiv:1102.1957 [nucl-ex]
  • 23.STAR Collaboration, J. Adams et al., K(892) resonance production in Au+Au and p+p collisions at sNN = 200 GeV at STAR. Phys. Rev. C 71, 064902 (2005). arXiv:nucl-ex/0412019 [nucl-ex]
  • 24.STAR Collaboration, B.I. Abelev et al., Strange baryon resonance production in sNN = 200 GeV p+p and Au+Au collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 132301 (2006). arXiv:nucl-ex/0604019 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.STAR Collaboration, B.I. Abelev et al., Hadronic resonance production in d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC. Phys. Rev. C 78, 044906 (2008). arXiv:0801.0450 [nucl-ex]
  • 26.STAR Collaboration, B.I. Abelev et al., Measurements of ϕ meson production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. C 79, 064903 (2009). arXiv:0809.4737 [nucl-ex]
  • 27.STAR Collaboration, M.M. Aggarwal et al., K0 production in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at sNN=62.4 GeV and 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 84, 034909 (2011). arXiv:1006.1961 [nucl-ex]
  • 28.PHENIX Collaboration, A. Adare et al., Nuclear modification factors of ϕ mesons in d+Au, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 83, 024909 (2011). arXiv:1004.3532 [nucl-ex]
  • 29.PHENIX Collaboration, A. Adare et al., ϕ meson production in d + Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 92(4), 044909 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.044909. arXiv:1506.08181 [nucl-ex] [nucl-ex]
  • 30.ALICE Collaboration, B. Abelev et al., Production of K(892)0 and ϕ(1020) in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2183 (2012). arXiv:1208.5717 [hep-ex]
  • 31.ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., The differential production cross section of the ϕ(1020) meson in s = 7 TeV pp collisions measured with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C 74(7), 2895 (2014). arXiv:1402.6162 [hep-ex] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the inclusive ϕ cross-section in pp collisions at s=7TeV. Phys. Lett. B 703, 267–273 (2011). arXiv:1107.3935 [hep-ex]
  • 33.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., K(892)0 and ϕ(1020) production in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 91(2), 024609 (2015). arXiv:1404.0495 [nucl-ex]
  • 34.ALICE Collaboration, J. Adam et al., ϕ-meson production at forward rapidity in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV and in pp collisions at s = 2.76 TeV. arXiv:1506.09206 [nucl-ex]
  • 35.CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-proton collisions at the LHC. JHEP 09, 091 (2010). arXiv:1009.4122 [hep-ex]
  • 36.CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 718, 795–814 (2013). arXiv:1210.5482 [nucl-ex]
  • 37.ALICE Collaboration, B. Abelev et al., Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 719, 29–41 (2013). arXiv:1212.2001 [nucl-ex]
  • 38.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., Long-range angular correlations of π, K and p in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 726, 164–177 (2013). arXiv:1307.3237 [nucl-ex]
  • 39.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., Multiparticle azimuthal correlations in p–Pb and Pb–Pb collisions at the CERN large hadron collider. Phys. Rev. C 90(5), 054901 (2014). arXiv:1406.2474 [nucl-ex]
  • 40.Bozek P. Collective flow in p-Pb and d-Pd collisions at TeV energies. Phys. Rev. C. 2012;85:014911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.014911. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.P. Bozek, W. Broniowski, Correlations from hydrodynamic flow in p-Pb collisions. Phys. Lett. B. 718, 1557–1561 (2013). arXiv:1211.0845 [nucl-th]
  • 42.ALICE Collaboration, B. Abelev et al., Centrality dependence of π, K, p production in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 88, 044910 (2013). arXiv:1303.0737 [hep-ex]
  • 43.U.W. Heinz, Concepts of heavy ion physics, in 2003 CERN-CLAF School of High-Energy Physics, San Miguel Regla, Mexico, 1–14 June 2003 (2004), pp. 165–238. http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/CERN-2004-001. arXiv:hep-ph/0407360 [hep-ph]
  • 44.R.J. Fries, B. Muller, C. Nonaka, S.A. Bass, Hadron production in heavy ion collisions: Fragmentation and recombination from a dense parton phase. Phys. Rev. C 68, 044902 (2003). arXiv:nucl-th/0306027 [nucl-th] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.V. Minissale, F. Scardina, and V. Greco, Hadrons from coalescence plus fragmentation in AA collisions from RHIC to LHC energy. arXiv:1502.06213 [nucl-th]
  • 46.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Charged-particle multiplicity measurement in proton-proton collisions at s = 7 TeV with ALICE at LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 345–354 (2010). arXiv:1004.3514 [hep-ex]
  • 47.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., Multiplicity dependence of pion, kaon, proton and lambda production in p-Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 728, 25–38 (2014). arXiv:1307.6796 [nucl-ex]
  • 48.ALICE Collaboration, B. Abelev et al., Pseudorapidity density of charged particles in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(3), 032301 (2013). arXiv:1210.3615 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 49.ALICE Collaboration, J. Adam et al., Centrality dependence of particle production in p-Pb collisions at sNN= 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 91(6), 064905 (2015). arXiv:1412.6828 [nucl-ex]
  • 50.Particle Data Group Collaboration K. A. Olive et al., Review of particle physics. Chin. Phys. C. 2014;38:090001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.J. Stachel, A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, Confronting LHC data with the statistical hadronization model. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 509, 012019 (2014). arXiv:1311.4662 [nucl-th]
  • 52.M. Bleicher, J. Aichelin, Strange resonance production: Probing chemical and thermal freezeout in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B. 530, 81–87 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0201123 [hep-ph]
  • 53.A. G. Knospe, C. Markert, K. Werner, J. Steinheimer, M. Bleicher, Hadronic resonance production and interaction in partonic and hadronic matter in EPOS3 with and without the hadronic afterburner UrQMD. Phys. Rev. C 93(1), 014911 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014911. arXiv:1509.07895 [nucl-th]
  • 54.ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC. JINST 3, S08002 (2008)
  • 55.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., Performance of the ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430044 (2014). arXiv:1402.4476 [nucl-ex]
  • 56.M.L. Miller, K. Reygers, S.J. Sanders, P. Steinberg, Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 205–243 (2007). arXiv:nucl-ex/0701025 [nucl-ex]
  • 57.T.W. Ludlam, A. Pfoh, and A. Shor, HIJET. A Monte Carlo event generator for p-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions, in Brookhaven Nat. Lab. Upton - BNL-37196 (REC.FEB.86) 9p, IN *BROOKHAVEN 1985, PROCEEDINGS, EXPERIMENTS FOR A RELATIVISTIC HEAVY ION COLLIDER* (1986), pp. 373–381
  • 58.ALICE Collaboration, B. Abelev et al., Centrality determination of Pb-Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV with ALICE. Phys. Rev. C 88(4), 044909 (2013). arXiv:1301.4361 [nucl-ex]
  • 59.Axial Field Spectrometer Collaboration, T. Akesson et al., Inclusive vector-meson production in the central region of pp collisions at s = 63 GeV. Nucl. Phys. B 203, 27 (1982). [Erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 229, 541 (1983)]
  • 60.Akindinov A, et al. Performance of the ALICE time-of-flight detector at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 2013;128:44. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2013-13044-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.S. Roesler, R. Engel, J. Ranft, The Monte Carlo event generator DPMJET-III, in Advanced Monte Carlo for radiation physics, particle transport simulation and applications. Proceedings, Conference, MC2000, Lisbon, Portugal, October 23–26, 2000, (2000) pp. 1033–1038. http://www-public.slac.stanford.edu/sciDoc/docMeta.aspx?slacPubNumber=SLAC-PUB-8740. arXiv:hep-ph/0012252 [hep-ph]
  • 62.R. Brun, F. Carminati, S. Giani, GEANT3, CERN Programming Library Report (1993)
  • 63.Tsallis C. Possible generalization of the Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J. Stat. Phys. 1988;52:479–487. doi: 10.1007/BF01016429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.ALICE Collaboration, J. Adam et al., “Measurement of pion, kaon and proton production in proton–proton collisions at s = 7 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 75(5), 226 (2015). arXiv:1504.00024 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.STAR Collaboration, B.I. Abelev et al., Strange particle production in p+p collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 75, 064901 (2007). arXiv:nucl-ex/0607033 [nucl-ex]
  • 66.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., Production of Σ(1385)± and Ξ(1530)0 in proton-proton collisions at s = 7 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 75(1), 1 (2015). arXiv:1406.3206 [nucl-ex] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.E. Schnedermann, J. Sollfrank, U.W. Heinz, Thermal phenomenology of hadrons from 200A GeV S+S collisions. Phys. Rev. C. 48, 2462–2475 (1993). arXiv:nucl-th/9307020 [nucl-th] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 68.ALICE Collaboration, J. Adam et al., Multi-strange baryon production in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV. arXiv:1512.07227 [nucl-ex]
  • 69.ALICE Collaboration, J. Adam et al., Two-pion femtoscopy in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 91, 034906 (2015). arXiv:1502.00559 [nucl-ex]
  • 70.ALICE Collaboration, B.B. Abelev et al., Multiplicity dependence of the average transverse momentum in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 727, 371–380 (2013). arXiv:1307.1094 [nucl-ex]

Articles from The European Physical Journal. C, Particles and Fields are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES