Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Oct;38(2):94–104. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9135-2

Table 4.

Discriminators of weight-loss maintainer and two treatment-seeking obese groups (TSO-1 and TSO-2) based on Bayesian model averaging analysis

WLM vs. TSO-1(ref)
WLM vs. TSO-2 (ref)
Pr. OR 95% CI E/V Pr. OR 95% CI E/V
Dietary restraint 1.00 1.63 (1.42, 1.86) 7.15 1.00 1.41 (1.28, 1.56) 6.92
Disinhibition 1.00 0.69 (0.58, 0.82) 4.24 1.00 0.83 (0.75, 0.92) 3.41
CES-D 0.04 1.00 (0.69, 1.44) 1.00 0.33 0.68 (0.19, 2.40) 0.60
Breakfast 0.06 0.97 (0.69, 1.37) 0.97 1.00 4.86 (2.31, 10.2) 4.17
High-fat food 1.00 0.67 (0.53, 0.86) 0.67 0.04 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.01
Fast-food consumption (at least 1/week vs. not) 0.06 0.97 (0.70, 1.35) 0.97 0.96 0.30 (0.12, 0.72) 2.68
Low-fat food 0.06 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) 1.01 0.08 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.22
Total calories expended in PA/week (per log10 1,000 cal.) 100 3.95 (1.88, 8.29) 0.81 1.00 2.85 (1.58, 5.16) 3.46
TV hours/week (10 h/week) 0.39 0.81 (0.45, 1.46) 3.63 0.07 0.99 (0.88, 1.12) 0.18
TVs in home 0.16 0.96 (0.74, 1.23) 0.96 1.00 0.56 (0.42, 0.75) 3.96
Total pieces of exercise equipment in the home 0.96 1.15 (1.03, 1.29) 1.15 0.37 1.03 (0.95, 1.12) 0.66

Pr the posterior probability that the variable is a discriminator, OR odds ratio, E/V effect size = posterior mean/posterior standard deviation