Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Dev Psychol. 2016 May-Jun;44:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2016.04.002

Table 6.

Bivariate Correlations Split by Attachment Status

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Lab EF -- .34** .49** .44** .41** .12 .29* −.11
2. School Behavioral Control .25* -- .36** .23 .18 .18 .25* .28*
3. Mother Parenting −.05 .19 -- .28* .21 .43** .48** −.03
4. EC Father Support .05 .004 .04 -- .60** −.03 .22 −.10
5. MC Father Support −.07 .25* .41** .41** -- .05 .14 −.21
6. Mother Age .18 −.07 .17 −.08 −.06 -- .51** .06
7. Mother Education .16 .14 .10 −.002 .13 .5** -- −.05
8. Child Sex .12 .34** −.08 .01 .01 −.08 −.05 --
*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

Note: The bottom left half shows children who were insecure at one or more time points (N = 100); the top right shows children who were always secure (N = 69). EC = Early Childhood, MC = Middle Childhood, EF = Executive Function. Child Sex 1 = Male, 2 = Female