Table 3.

MRI Coordinates

Analysis	Peak coordinates			Peak location	Cluster size (μl)	Z-score
	x	y	z
fMRI words > pseudowords	−34	28	−12	L inferior frontal gyrus	29296	5.07
	−4	42	52	L superior frontal gyrus	7248	4.97
	−32	−40	−24	L fusiform gyrus	2496	4.73
	10	−80	−26	R calcarine sulcus	2320	4
	30	26	−10	R inferior frontal gyrus	4224	3.78
fMRI visual semantics	−30	−36	−12	L parahippocampal gyrus / collateral sulcus	2656	4.9
fMRI abstract semantics	−50	20	−12	L superior temporal gyrus	34984	5.38
	−38	−90	−2	L middle occipital gyrus	2832	4.62
	0	16	56	L / R superior frontal gyrus	7480	4.29
	−4	−20	10	L thalamus	4048	4.23
Patient atrophy	−29	−5	−34	L fusiform gyrus	93387	8.54
	48	−1	−22	R middle temporal gyrus	10194	6.13
	−17	41	11	L cingulate gyrus	1290	5.75
	54	−44	−13	R inferior temporal gyrus	910	5.44
	−31	12	32	L middle frontal gyrus	166	5.27
	−57	−57	−6	L inferior temporal gyrus	214	5.15
	−15	15	35	L cingulate gyrus	53	5.08
Patient regression analysis	−28	−32	−7	L parahippocampal gyrus / hippocampus	2660	4.11

The results for “fMRI words > pseudowords” come from the contrast of word-association trials with pseudoword letter-matching trials. The results for “fMRI visual semantics” reflect the positive effects of the parametric modulator for visual association strength. The results for “fMRI abstract semantics” reflect the negative effects of the parametric modulator for visual association strength. The results for “Patient atrophy” are from the contrast of gray matter density in patients relative to controls. The results for the “Patient regression analysis” are from the regression of gray matter density and performance on visual relative to abstract concepts.