Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;49(7):2802–2813. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02710

Table 2. DLS and SAXS Analysis of Cyclic and Linear Graft Copolymers P4P9.

polymer PNAM arm length Dh(H2O)a (nm) Dh(dioxane)a (nm) Rg(H2O)b (nm) Rg(dioxane)b (nm) dimension parameter (H2O)c Rgb/Rha (H2O)
cyclic-P4 30 7.6 ± 0.5 8.2 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.01 4.2 ± 0.01 0.18 0.87
linear-P7 30 6.7 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.01 3.5 ± 0.01 0.20 0.81
cyclic-P5 50 10 ± 1 12 ± 1 4.3 ± 0.01 4.5 ± 0.01 0.65 0.86
linear-P8 50 7.7 ± 0.6 8.9 ± 0.4 3.5 ± 0.02 4.5 ± 0.05 0.16 0.91
cyclic-P6 110 12 ± 0.4 13 ± 0.5 5.7 ± 0.01 4.7 ± 0.17 0.29 0.95
linear-P9 110 13 ± 0.4 14 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.01 d 0.27 0.89
a

Determined by DLS analysis, concentration 4 mg mL–1.

b

Determined by SAXS analysis using the Guinier–Porod model in Igor software, concentration 0.5 mg mL–1.

c

Determined by the Guinier–Porod model; 0 means spherical micelles, 1 is for rodlike micelles, and 2 is for platelike micelles. The model is more accurate for hard micelles but can still give information for softer or looser assemblies.

d

Poor sample collection did not provide raw data of good quality.