Skip to main content
. 2002 Jun 1;107(3):279–298. doi: 10.6028/jres.107.022

Table 2.

Individual Results for Elemental Carbon in SRM 1649a

Row Method Team EC/TC u(EC/TC) N
1 AETH   1 0.069 0.004 4
2 T375   2 0.074 0.002 ≥2
3 T375   3 0.077 0.002 3
4 T375   4 0.079 0.005 3
5 TOK   5 0.109 0.005 9
6 T375   6 0.187 0.013 6
7 TOT 18 0.200 0.005 4
8 Ch(N1)T   7 0.224 0.013 5
9 TOT   8 0.258 0.014 3
10 Ch(N2)T   7 0.280 0.004 6
11 Ch(N2)T   1 0.283 0.022 3
12 Ch(N3)   9 0.292 0.017 5
13 T340   7 0.346 0.025 5
14 T340 10 0.347 0.026 4
15 TOR 11 0.432 0.009 3
16 TLT 12 0.438 0.006 5
17 Ch(Cr)K 13 0.458 0.025 9
18 T500_EGA 14 0.500 0.010 2
19 Ch(N4) 13 0.520 0.057 3

Notes

EC/TC: Italics denote measurements on ACG prototype filters.

Row-6: T375 oxidation time 12 h, rather than 24 h.

Row-7: TOT tabulated result is for the bulk SRM; filter (ACG) result [Team 5] is 0.210 (u = 0.007, n = 7).

Row-8: Ch(N1)T result for small samples; possibility of particle loss.

Row-9: TOT tabulated result is for the bulk SRM; filter (ACG) result is 0.264 (n = 32).

Row-14: T340 tabulated result is for the bulk SRM; filter (ACG) result is 0.385 (n = 1).

Row-16: TLT tabulated result is the average of five results reported by Team 12. Separate results for the bulk SRM and filter (ACG) are 0.416 (n = 1) and 0.443 (n = 4).

Row-18: T500 tabulated result is upper limit, because of possible OC co-evolution; OC solvent removal result, 0.40, is a lower limit, because of particle loss.