Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 18;291(16):8591–8601. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.701870

TABLE 2.

Comparison of TSC1-TBC1D7 binding (pulldown versus co-IP): TSC1 and TBC1D7 amino acid substitutions

Effect on TSC1-TBC1D7 interaction
Pulldown TBC1D7 IP; TSC1 co-IP (Fig. 6g) TSC1 IP; TBC1D7 co-IP (Fig. 6e)
TSC1 substitution
    I954A (helix A) No interaction Reduced interaction Reduced interaction
    F958A (helix A) No interaction Reduced interaction Reduced interaction
    I962A (helix B) No interaction Reduced interaction Reduced interaction
    L965A/L969A (helix A/B)a Reduced interaction Reduced interaction No significant reduction
    Y966A (helix B) Reduced interaction Reduced interaction No significant reduction

TBC1D7 substitution
    R81A/Q84A/R121A No interaction No interaction Reduced interaction
    H90A/R96A No interaction No significant reduction Reduced interaction
    V94A/V95A No interaction Reduced interaction Reduced interaction
    R96A Reduced interaction No significant reduction No significant reduction
    L114A No interaction No significant reduction No significant reduction
    R121A No significant reduction No significant reduction No significant reduction

a The two L965/L969 pairs from both TSC1 helices interact with each other and play a role in stabilizing TSC1 dimerization, but neither residue directly contacts TBC1D7.