Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;54(12):2166–2170. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev254

Table 1.

Comparison of RA activity scores and radiological scores over follow-up according to the presence of FRA

FRA No FRA Difference in adjusted scores P-valuea
DAS28 3.50 3.05 0.45 <0.0001
SDAI 16.09 11.54 4.55 <0.0001
CDAI 14.98 10.75 4.23 <0.0001
HAQ 0.63 0.45 0.17 0.0002
SJC 2.32 2.18 0.14 0.5476
TJC 7.97 3.27 2.37 0.0001
PtGH VAS 3.82 3.01 0.81 <0.0001
PhGH VAS 2.88 2.38 0.51 0.0044
CRP 0.75 0.84 0.09 0.4147
ESR 13.99 15.05 1.06 0.3602
SHARP 7.33 7.68 0.34 0.3125

aEstimates presented correspond to the least squares means using a mixed regression model including the 6-, 12- and 18-month visit, adjusting for baseline score, gender, age and smoking status. CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS28: 28-joint DAS; FRA: fibromyalgic RA; PhGH: physician global health; PtGH: patient global health; SDAI: Simplified Disease Activity Index; SHARP: Sharp–van der Heijde score; SJC: swollen joint count, TJC: tender joint count; VAS: visual analogue scale.