Table 1.
Sulcal caries unit scores in different groups.
| Group | Incidence of sulcal caries | Severity of sulcal caries | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ea | Dsa | Dxa | ||||||
| Control | Fb | 18 | 32* | 3 | 6* | 0 | 0 | |
| Mb | 14 | 3 | 0 | |||||
| UA159 | F | 30 | 60 | 15 | 24 | 3 | 3 | |
| M | 30 | 9 | 0 | |||||
| Smurnc | F | 24 | 48* | 18 | 42* | 9 | 12 | |
| M | 24 | 24 | 3 | |||||
| Smurnc+ | F | 21 | 45* | 9 | 24 | 3 | 9 | |
| M | 24 | 15 | 6 | |||||
The linear extent of lesions in point plane and recording the depth of penetration are under 3 headings: enamel only (E), slight dentinal (Ds) and extensive dentinal (Dx).
Each of 4 groups was divided into female (F) and male (M) two sub-groups.
The data represent the sulcal carious lesions score according to a modified Keyes in this study. Shapiro–Wilk tests and Bartlett's tests showed that the data were nonparametric. By using UA159 as a reference, significant differences were determined using the Kruskal–Wallis test and least significant difference (LSD) multiple comparisons test. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05.