Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 25;4(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4489

Table 3.

Lessons learned and changes made for testing PA technology in broader community-based populations.

Theme and subthemes Changes made
Feedback




Desire for immediate device feedback
  • Taught participants how to use the wristband’s colored lights to monitor activity minutes (ie, lights progress through series of colors as participant approaches 30 minutes of vigorous activity)

    • Red=less than 50% of goal

    • Yellow= 50-75% of goal

    • Green=75-99% of goal

    • Blue=100% or above goal


Accessibility of feedback about PA
  • Provided clear definition of vigorous activity in both the training and instruction manual (ie, activities that require hard physical effort and cause large increases in breathing or heart rate, eg, running, aerobics, using the elliptical machine, with arms, or playing a sport like football, basketball, soccer, or tennis)

Design of PA monitor

Physical discomfort
  • Informed participants about wristband-related skin irritation during device training and in the instruction manual

  • Instructed participants to wear the wristband loosely if irritation is likely

  • Ensured that participants latched wristband properly during device training


Features
  • Incorporated detailed section on the wristband’s colored lights during device training and on the “Helpful Hints” for at-home reference

Ambiguity over project goals
  • Redesigned education component to explicitly state project goals (ie, participants should continue with routine PA and not change behavior)

  • Explicitly stated project goals in written instruction materials

  • Developed two instructional training videos on device and hub usage that were used during device training and made publically available after the event for participant reference

  • Incorporated more hands-on in-person training where participants could use the website, test wristband lights, and upload wristband data

Recording PA
  • Instructed participants to test sleep mode during device training

  • Educated participants on the use of sleep mode, but purposefully did not emphasize its use

  • Tested website to manually input sleep and PA during device training

  • Developed instructional video on recording PA that was used during hub and device training and was made publically available during the study for participant reference

Issues about hub
  • Corresponded weekly with device company and participants to identify and troubleshoot hub issues

  • Incorporated troubleshooting report sheet next to hub for streamlined reporting

  • Provided participants with a schedule of “hub hours” and the option to synchronize wristbands at any of the participating churches

  • Identified a point-person within church community to aid in troubleshooting minor hub issues

Website for supporting PA monitors
  • Incorporated website Q&A and an opportunity to log-in during device training

  • Corresponded regularly with participants to troubleshoot website challenges

Feasibility of using PA-monitoring system
  • Chose hub locations within churches that were accessible for all participants


Suggestions for improvement
  • Identified point-person within church community to aid in troubleshooting and correspondence between participants and research team during study period