Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;6:25687. doi: 10.1038/srep25687

Figure 5. Comparison of GDT-TS score between the MTMG models and the Modeller models from three aspects on CASP11 targets.

Figure 5

(a) MTMG performed better than Modeller on targets with <0.7 template coverage. (b) MTMG performs better than Modeller on targets covered by <10 templates. (c) MTMG performs better than Modeller on targets containing multiple domains.