Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Relig Health. 2009 Aug 28;50(2):407–421. doi: 10.1007/s10943-009-9281-7

Table 2.

Participating Baltimore churches’ HIV-related programs, practices, and policies (N = 16)

Characteristic N (%)
Has established HIV/AIDS ministry
    No 12 (75)
    Yesa 4 (25)
Provides HIV/AIDS education and awareness
    No 4 (25)
    Yes 12 (75)
Provides HIV testing on-site during the previous year
    No 11 (69)
    Yes 5 (31)
Holds HIV/AIDS support groups
    No 13 (81)
    Yes 3 (19)
Provides case management for PLWHAb
    No 15 (94)
    Yes 1 (6)
Church leader(s) attended a training on HIV/AIDS
    No 7 (44)
    Yes 9 (56)
Church leader(s) are active in local HIV/AIDS coalition
    No 13 (81)
    Yes 3 (19)
Facilitates candid discussion of risk reduction
    No 8 (50)
    Yes 8 (50)
Affirms persons of all sexual orientationsc
    No 8 (50)
    Yes 8 (50)
Facilitates candid discussion of risk reduction and affirms persons of all sexual orientations
    No 12 (75)
    Yes 4 (25)
Formed local partnerships to conduct formal needs assessment of congregations' issues
    No 14 (88)
    Yes 2 (12)
a

All of the HIV/AIDS ministries were in churches with majority Black congregations. Two were in zip codes in the highest quartile for prevalence of HIV/ AIDS

b

Persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA)

c

These churches represent themselves as welcoming Christian churches (i.e., “gay friendly”). This does not imply that they are allowed to ordain gay ministers, perform holy unions, etc., as these issues are usually set at the denominational level and therefore outside of the auspices of individual churches. For the purpose of this study, affirmation means that the congregation welcomes and treats gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) persons with love and respect and does not consider homosexuality to be a sin