Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 23;300(6):586–595. doi: 10.1002/mame.201500016

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Baseplate fracture force (a) and MN compressive stiffness (b) as a function of the crosslinking time for hydrogels prepared using the conventional method (Means ± SD, n ≥ 3). Insertion profile in Parafilm for MN prepared using different crosslinking times following the conventional oven process (Means ± SD, n = 3) (c). Baseplate fracture force (d) and MN compressive stiffness (e) as a function of the crosslinking time for hydrogels prepared using the novel MW method (Means ± SD, n ≥ 3). Insertion profile in Parafilm® for MN prepared using different crosslinking times following the MW process (f). (Means ± SD, n = 3).