Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;9:251. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1535-0

Table 2.

Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens as detected by PCR in 76 cervids and 65 wild boars from Centre and southern Portugal

Idependent variable/category Cervus elaphus & Dama dama Sus scrofa
No. (%) Anaplasma spp. Theileria spp. No. (%) Anaplasma spp. Theileria spp.
% of positive 95 % CI % of positive 95 % CI % of positive 95 % CI % of positive 95 % CI
District 76 ND* ND* 65 ND* ND*
 Castelo Branco 27 (35.5) 59.3a 38.8–77.6 44.4 25.5–64.7 4 (6.2) 0 0–60.2 0.0 0.0–60.2
 Portalegre 1 (1.3) 100 2.5–100 100 2.5–100 15 (23.1) 0 0–21.8 0.0 0.0–21.8
 Lisboa 3 (3.9) 66.7 9.4–99.2 66.7 9.4–99.2 16 (24.6) 0 0–20.6 0.0 0.0–20.6
 Évora 15 (23.1) 0 0–21.8 0.0 0.0–21.8
 Beja 45 (59.2) 31.1a 18.2–46.7 42.2 27.7–57.9 15 (23.1) 13.3 1.66–40.5 20.0 4.3–48.1
Age 61 P = 0.309 P = 0.607c 62 P = 1 P = 0.545
 Adult 50 (82.0) 40.0 26.4–54.8 46.0 31.8–60.7 42 (67.7) 4.8 0.6–16.2 7.1 1.5–19.5
 Young 11 (18.0) 18.2 2.3–51.8 54.5 23.4–83.3 20 (32.3) 0 0–16.8 0.0 0.0–16.8
Gender 69 P = 0.618b P = 0.025d 63 P = 0.493 P = 1
 Female 37 (53.6) 37.8 22.5–55.2 32.4 18.0–49.8 45 (71.4) 2.2 0.1–11.8 4.4 0.5–15.2
 Male 32 (46.4) 43.8 26.4–62.3 59.4 40.7–76.3 18 (28.6) 5.6 0.1–27.3 5.6 0.1–27.3
Total 76 43.4 32.1–55.3 44.7 33.3–56.6 65 3.1 0.4–10.7 4.6 1.0–12.9

a χ 2 = 5.50, df = 1, P = 0.019

b χ 2 = 0.25, df = 1

c χ 2 = 0.26, df = 1

d χ 2 = 5.03, df = 1

ND* Statistically significant difference(s) not confirmed after pairwise comparisons