Table 2.
Final coding tree
Themes | Interviewsa | Sub-themes | |
---|---|---|---|
Category 1: Staff experience of implementing the trial intervention | |||
1 | Extra work but rewarding | 27 | |
2 | Team practice changes | 24 | |
Changes to usual care | |||
Category 2: Barriers to intervention implementation | |||
3 | Team challenges | 19 | ` |
4 | Staffing challenges | 37 | |
5 | Organisational or workplace barriers | 28 | |
The acute model and culture | |||
Barriers to ASU access: | |||
Competing priorities | |||
Physical environment barriers | |||
6 | Staff attitudes and beliefs | 32 | |
Not ‘on board’ | |||
Beliefs about roles and capabilities | |||
Beliefs about consequences | |||
7 | Patients’ barriers | 35 | |
Acuity, instability and complexity | |||
Severity of stroke | |||
Fatigue | |||
Family anxiety | |||
Category 3: Overcoming implementation barriers | |||
8 | Teamwork central to success | 43 | |
Communication and coordination | |||
9 | Getting staff ‘on board’ | 35 | |
Staff education and training | |||
Leadership for change | |||
10 | Working differently | 29 | |
‘This is what we do here’ | |||
Shifting control | |||
Staffing model changes | |||
Dealing with fatigue |
anumber of interviews containing data supporting the theme