Skip to main content
. 2016 May 5;11:553–562. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S99842

Table 3.

FS evaluation in each domain: global, physical, psychological, and social

Tilburg scale scores (patients) Total
N=91
Age (years)
Comparison resulta
65–75
N=37
76–85
N=40
86–92
N=14
Global
 M ± SD 7.43±2.57 5.70±2.22 8.42±2.18 9.14±1.79
 Me (Q1; Q3) 8 (5; 9) 5 (4; 8) 8 (7; 10) 9 (8; 10) P<0.001
 Min–Max 1–13 1–11 4–13 5–12
Physical
 M ± SD 5.04±1.88 3.49±1.63 6.05±1.18 6.29±1.14
 Me (Q1; Q3) 5 (4; 6) 3 (2; 5) 6 (5; 7) 6 (6; 7) P<0.001
 Min–Max 0–8 0–7 4–8 4–8
Psychological
 M ± SD 1.53±0.96 1.32±0.91 1.62±0.98 1.79±0.97
 Me (Q1; Q3) 2 (1; 2) 1 (1; 2) 2 (1; 2) 2 (1; 2) P=0.159
 Min–Max 0–3 0–3 0–3 0–3
Social
 M ± SD 0.88±0.74 0.89±0.77 0.82±0.71 1.00±0.78
 Me (Q1; Q3) 1 (0; 1) 1 (0; 1) 1 (0; 1) 1 (0; 2) P=0.716
 Min–Max 0–3 0–3 0–3 0–2

Notes:

a

Kruskal–Wallis test. Data in bold indicates statistical significance.

Abbreviations: FS, frailty syndrome; M, mean; Max, the value of the largest; Me, median; Min, the smallest value; Q1, lower quartile (25th percentile); Q3, the upper quartile (75th percentile); SD, standard deviation.