Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jul;7(4):517–526. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.4.517

Table 3.

Mean (SD) Values and Beta (β) Values for Psychosocial, Goal-Related, and Behavioral Outcomes at Immediate Follow-Up

Choice (n = 62)a
Expert (n = 82)a
Comparison (n = 100)a
β valuesb
Baseline Immediate Baseline Immediate Baseline Immediate CH vs. EX CH vs. CO EX vs. CO
Intention 3.90 (0.92) 3.99 (0.87) 3.41 (1.10) 3.64 (1.04) 3.95 (1.09) 4.01 (1.01) −0.14 0.03 0.17
−0.13 0.04 0.17
Self-efficacy 2.81 (0.87) 2.89 (0.81) 2.47 (0.91) 2.69 (0.86) 3.07 (0.90) 3.07 (0.91) −0.14 0.08 0.22*
−0.13 0.09 0.22*
Goal commitment 4.01 (0.70) 4.11 (0.75) 3.64 (0.92) 3.94 (0.85) 4.21 (0.80) 4.17 (0.88) −0.20* 0.14 0.34**
−0.20* 0.15 0.34**
Goal difficulty 2.36 (1.02) 2.54 (1.16) 2.09 (1.22) 2.40 (1.18) 2.85 (1.23) 2.97 (1.31) −0.14 0.06 0.20
−0.08 0.12 0.19

Abbreviations: CH, choice group; EX, expert group; CO, comparison group.

Note. All means are unadjusted. Intention measured from 1 (low) to 5 (high); self-efficacy measured from 1 (low) to 4 (high); commitment measured from 1 (low) to 5 (high); difficulty measured from 1 (very) to 5 (not at all).

*

P ≤ .05;

**

P ≤ .01.

a

Numbers vary slightly due to missing data across outcomes.

b

Regression coefficients from linear regression models; for each outcome variable, the top row presents unadjusted values; the bottom row presents values adjusted for age, education, and race.