Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Metab. 2015 Oct 8;22(5):895–906. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.008

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A. Estimated false positive rate for given percent increase in RLS and number of mother cells n. x-axis indicates % increase in RLS relative to wild type control, y-axis indicates sample size n, and z-axis and point color indicate estimated false positive proportion. B. Estimated false negative rate at a threshold of 30% increased RLS, for given actual percent increased RLS and number of mother cells n. x-axis indicates actual % increase expected for the genotype, z-axis indicates the estimated false negative proportion using a 30% screening cutoff, and point color indicates sample size n (black, n=5, blue, n=10, red, n=40).